Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nordyke V King
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ^ | April 20, 2009 | Arthur L. Alarcón, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and Ronald M. Gould

Posted on 04/20/2009 10:50:34 AM PDT by atomic_dog

[excerpted]

We therefore conclude that the right to keep and bear arms is “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.” Colonial revolutionaries, the Founders, and a host of commentators and lawmakers living during the first one hundred years of the Republic all insisted on the fundamental nature of the right. It has long been regarded as the “true palladium of liberty.” Colonists relied on it to assert and to win their independence, and the victorious Union sought to prevent a recalcitrant South from abridging it less than a century later. The crucial role this deeply rooted right has played in our birth and history compels us to recognize that it is indeed fundamental, that it is necessary to the Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty that we have inherited. We are therefore persuaded that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment and applies it against the states and local governments.

(Excerpt) Read more at ca9.uscourts.gov ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
The Ninth Circuit hits a home run. Pandora's box is open for business.
1 posted on 04/20/2009 10:50:34 AM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Hopefully they’re breaking from their tradition of “Most Frequently Reversed”.


2 posted on 04/20/2009 10:51:52 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

bookmark.


3 posted on 04/20/2009 10:53:01 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Someone please explain this to we the unwashed.....please


4 posted on 04/20/2009 10:55:46 AM PDT by stockpirate (The NAZI's called themselves - "The Children of the New Age of World Order")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Wow!!!


5 posted on 04/20/2009 10:57:22 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog
King declared she had “been trying to get rid of gun shows on Country property” for “about three years,” but she had “gotten the run around from spineless people hiding behind the constitution, and been attacked by aggressive gun toting mobs on right wing talk radio.”

Must be some of those terrorists that DHS warned us about.

6 posted on 04/20/2009 10:59:00 AM PDT by 50cal Smokepole (It's only recoil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog
newsflash ... sun to set in the East and watch out for pork in the treetops.

Catch this from the background portion of the opinion: Supervisor Mary King had “gotten the run around from spineless people hiding behind the constitution ..."

Hiding behind the Constitution, Mary? Better take another look at your oath of office, you idiot.

7 posted on 04/20/2009 11:00:03 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Someone please explain this to we the unwashed.....please

Basically, I think it means that states can't usurp the second amendment via state or local law.

Anyone want to add or correct me on this?

8 posted on 04/20/2009 11:03:40 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

This means the States in the 9th Circuit (West Coast and Mountain West) have to follow the 2nd Amendment.

Most of the Federal Bill of Rights applies to the States through the 14th Amendment, the 2nd Amendment historically has not.


9 posted on 04/20/2009 11:07:00 AM PDT by DGodbey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Hopefully they’re breaking from their tradition of “Most Frequently Reversed”.

Not exactly ... in getting this one right, it was necessary for them to reverse themselves albeit with the notion that SCOTUS would if they didn't. Dripping with irony, no?

I'm not sure this is a complete victory as I think choosing a direct application of the Second would be better than using the Fourteenth, but reserve the right to revise and extend my remarks.

10 posted on 04/20/2009 11:07:09 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
"Someone please explain this to we the unwashed.....please"

In a nutshell, this means that the right that is identified in the second amendment applies to all Americans. It sounds silly to us I know. What Heller basically stated was that the second amendment was an individual not a collective right. If this is not overturned by the U.S. Supremes, that means that all 50 states have to recognize the right to keep and bear arms as an individual and not collective right.

For all the lawyers out there, they may lay it out better, but I believe this is generally what the issue is.
11 posted on 04/20/2009 11:08:04 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden (iIt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
"“gotten the run around from spineless people hiding behind the constitution ..."

That is one of the most shocking statements I have ever heard come from a government employee at any level.

I wonder if she feels the same contempt for people who "hide behind" the Constitution when refusing to sit at the back of the bus, eat at the "black" counter or have the gall to go to a all white school. I'm guessing she doesn't.

12 posted on 04/20/2009 11:09:29 AM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog
Pinch me...I must be dreaming.

Oh I get it they feel free to do this because The Great Apologizer is going to sign off on the UN treaty making guns illegal for anyone but governments and security professionals to own.

Pardon my momentary excitement.
13 posted on 04/20/2009 11:09:46 AM PDT by Sudetenland (Congress has too many politicians and Leftistlators and not enough Constitutionalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

NOTE: The 2nd Amendment is SELF-incorporated to all government entities at every level. It is MORE ABSOLUTE than the 1st Amendment, or any of the others, because the wording forbids not only CONGRESS, but ANYONE from infringing on it. The 1st says “Congress shall make no law...”. The 2nd say “shall NOT be infringed!” Period! End of debate!


14 posted on 04/20/2009 11:10:31 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

This applies only to the States within the 9th Circuit.


15 posted on 04/20/2009 11:11:56 AM PDT by DGodbey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

This ought to get the liberals panties in a knot. More like a gigantic wedgie.


16 posted on 04/20/2009 11:13:28 AM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

To keep your same theme, what about those people hiding behind the constitution allowing her to vote.


17 posted on 04/20/2009 11:15:43 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden (iIt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Amazing. This is the 9th?

Maybe there is hope after all.


18 posted on 04/20/2009 11:16:57 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGodbey
"This applies only to the States within the 9th Circuit.

What? No, I don't believe that's accurate. Unless this is set aside by SCOTUS, this will be cited in all relative cases regardless of Appellate district in which they may fall.

19 posted on 04/20/2009 11:17:01 AM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

I think all of us agree with you, but we have to play the game here and make it “legal”. I will find this amusing because it should make national news and we’ll see if “the one” is asked to comment on it. Yes, I believe the 2nd amendment says individuals have a right to keep and bear arms and the 14th amendment is the incorporation amendment. What will be left unsaid is he wants to get rid of the 2nd and make the incorporation of it moot.


20 posted on 04/20/2009 11:19:32 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden (iIt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson