Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
On top of which, the South probably would have been left to go their own way if that IDIOT Chesnut hadn’t opened fire on Fort Sumter. He should have starved them out and taken their surrender afterwards.

I doubt that; for Lincoln it was all about preserving the union. Incidentally, Edmund Ruffin (a Virginian) actually fired the first shot at Ft. Sumter (he later, upon hearing of the surrender at Appomattox, wrapped himself in a Confederate flag and blew his brains out.) I believe you are thinking of Mary Chesnut who chronicled much of the war in her diary for the South.

74 posted on 04/15/2009 4:48:16 PM PDT by meandog (There are bad no dogs, only bad owners--the only good bad owner is one mauled by a good bad dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: meandog

Colonel James Chesnut, Jr. is the idiot who asked for Fort Sumter’s surrender, and when he didn’t get it, ordered his forces to fire into the Fort.


79 posted on 04/15/2009 4:54:25 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
You said: “Texas still produces a lot of oil and I don't believe that Mr. 0bama is going to forgo that needed resource to help pay for his grandiose plans.”

You also said: “for Lincoln it was all about preserving the union.”

"Preserving the union" is the euphemism that historians have adopted to rationalize Lincoln's attacks on the South.

He wanted to maintain access to Southern cotton and the Mississippi. That is why he sent the warships to Charleston and Pensacola.

130 posted on 04/16/2009 6:40:07 AM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson