[Filo]

Some think it a great 'gotcha' question because they assume that 'God' would be subject to the constraints of philosophical naturalism and they lack the critical-thinking skills to reason this out for themselves. [...]

ROFLMAO.

What a self-serving, steaming pile of contrived and utterly worthless BS.

If that's the alternative I'm sticking with the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

[GourmetDan]

"ROFLMAO."

Uh oh, now what will you speak with?

"What a self-serving, steaming pile of contrived and utterly worthless BS."

No, that would be YA that you just L'dO.

"If that's the alternative I'm sticking with the Flying Spaghetti Monster."

There is just as much evidence for the FSM as there is for philosophical naturalism. Unless you engage in logical fallacy, that is.

[tpanther]

What a self-serving, steaming pile of contrived and utterly worthless BS.

If that's the alternative I'm sticking with the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

But but but...I thought it was the PURPLE flying spaghetti monster!

P-U-R-P-L-E !!!!!!!!

I'm truly disappointed! My faith in evolution has been shaken once again today! You need to confer with your liberal ilk and straighten this out! STAT!!!! If you don't watch out, we'll have red, orange, perhaps fuscia flying spaghetti monsters competing with your purple version ... and walking or swimming is next! And don't we ALL know we need to have only ONE version of a flying spaghetti monster taught, or none taught at all!