To: Filo; GourmetDan
There simply is no non-naturlalistic reality. [excerpt]
Can you describe the naturalistic process that resulted in the creation of the laws of physics by which nature operates?
122 posted on
04/22/2009 1:08:39 PM PDT by
Fichori
(The only bailout I'm interested in is the one where the entire Democrat party leaves the county)
To: Fichori
Can you describe the naturalistic process that resulted in the creation of the laws of physics by which nature operates?
Clearly some great sky being waved his hands and created them.
Duh!
(May you be touched by his Noodly Appendage)
If we're asking stupid origins questions how about this one: Who created God*?
123 posted on
04/22/2009 1:48:35 PM PDT by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: Filo; Fichori; GourmetDan; nanetteclaret; metmom; count-your-change; tpanther; do the dhue
Filo, if there's no evidence of a non-naturalistic reality as you claim, and indeed, the total lack of evidence is so obvious that anyone who believes there may be a God is a moron, then how could an article like
this one even exist?
And why is it that you place an asterisk next to God's name? Do you think He used steroids to get His home run record?
164 posted on
04/25/2009 9:39:42 AM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson