Regardless of if he pays or not, he has a right to see the child - all state’s laws that I have read bear that out. Non payment of child support is not a defense for not allowing visitation to an NCP. I highly doubt AK law is any different.
Talk about the moral angle all you want, the legal angle is that she must allow court ordered visitation (if that exists), and he can get it ordered if it doesn’t - regardless of his status of supporting the child.
If CS is ordered, then you can bet visitation is too.
We need to kick the radical “anti feminists” out of the Republican party.
They are becoming a big problem. They don’t live in the real world in 2009.
Mothers should all be housewives ? yeah right..
Yes, I know that *legally* child support and visitation are completely separate issues. But in reality, a father who doesn’t want to pay child support isn’t going to make a legal issue out of visitation as long as the mother isn’t making a legal issue out of child support. Bristol has certainly made plenty of money from media appearances and could make a huge wad any time she likes by doing a book deal (and I wonder how much her mom is bribing her not to go ahead and do that). Levi has whined that Bristol won’t let him take the baby anywhere — I don’t think any of the parties involved really want to get into a court battle over things like whether Levi should be formally prohibited from taking the child to the home of his drug-dealing mom.