On what basis? Because you don't like them? If the words posted as a transcript were incorrect, are you suggesting that no one would have ever challenged them and demanded a correction?
Does not compute.
You keep harping on less than a handful of gotcha interviews and ignore the vast majority of things she has said on the topic.
Not true. I have posted the actual transcripts of Sarah's words from every interview transcript I have found on addressing climate-change/global-warming and cap-and-trade and challenged those who have claimed that their are "long lists" of contrary statements to post them along with citations and links. They have not done so.
So, now is your chance: Please post the "majority of things she has said on the topic" of climate change and cap and trade along with sources and links.
Here is a full list of what "On the Issues" attributes to Palin on the subject of Global Warming:
• I do support capping carbon emissions. (Oct 2008)
• Cyclical temperature changes affect climate change. (Oct 2008)
• All-of-the-above approach to deal with climate change. (Oct 2008)
• Global warming affects Alaska, but is not man-made. (Aug 2008)
• Analyze potential costs associated with climate change. (Oct 2006)
On the basis that they were interviews given by some of the most rabid Palin-haters and tape was left on the CUTTING ROOM FLOOR as has been explained to you time and time again.
The list you make is quite short so easy to do. Go and do some research on Google and look at the innumerable times she has spoken out in FAVOR of energy development as opposed to cutbacks. That list would be vastly longer than yours and very difficult to do because it would involve innumerable pro-energy speeches. I'm really not interested in spending the long hours on you.
To suggest that Palin is an enviro is wacky and WAY out there. Really. You need to get smarter and quit citing Couric interviews as proofs. Sheesh.