On the basis that they were interviews given by some of the most rabid Palin-haters and tape was left on the CUTTING ROOM FLOOR as has been explained to you time and time again.
The list you make is quite short so easy to do. Go and do some research on Google and look at the innumerable times she has spoken out in FAVOR of energy development as opposed to cutbacks. That list would be vastly longer than yours and very difficult to do because it would involve innumerable pro-energy speeches. I'm really not interested in spending the long hours on you.
To suggest that Palin is an enviro is wacky and WAY out there. Really. You need to get smarter and quit citing Couric interviews as proofs. Sheesh.
Then what explains your total failure to produce any contrary list or any substantive rebuttal of the several exact quotes provided?
What part of transcript do you not understand?
The list you make is quite short so easy to do. Go and do some research on Google and look at the innumerable times she has spoken out in FAVOR of energy development as opposed to cutbacks.
The issue I am concerned with is massive government spending on non-viable energy sources (i.e. "all of the above approach") and Cap-and-trade.
I have googled it... and you've seen the results. If you have information to refute it, POST IT. Don't just sit there and whine "it's not true, it's not true."
To suggest that Palin is an enviro is wacky and WAY out there. Really. You need to get smarter and quit citing Couric interviews as proofs. Sheesh.
I didn't suggest she was wacky or way out there. I said she needs to be educated and she needs to OPPOSE cap-and-trade.
Do YOU support cap-and-trade?