Oh, you mean this?
"Regardless though of the reason for climate change, whether it's entirely, wholly caused by man's activities or is part of the cyclical nature of our planet"
Nice foot shot.
Of course, she's since moved on from such vague pandering and waffling to the point where she now contends that the IPPC models and other global warming junk science studies are the "most credible."
And the remark about "most credible" is from the paragraph where she is making the case for non-green petro-energy. She merely points out that even those who believe these models and the notion behind it (man made) should be supportive of non-green petro-energy.