[SolidWood]

Again you are spinning. In the same sentence you posted she says that it is just as likely NOT MAN MADE, but due to the CYCLICAL NATURE OF THE PLANET. It's in front of your eyes.

And the remark about "most credible" is from the paragraph where she is making the case for non-green petro-energy. She merely points out that even those who believe these models and the notion behind it (man made) should be supportive of non-green petro-energy.

[Mojave]

In the same sentence you posted she says that it is just as likely NOT MAN MADE, but due to the CYCLICAL NATURE OF THE PLANET.

Lying like a cheap rug. She says nothing of the kind and assigns no relative weight to either.

IFILL: We do need to keep within our two minutes. But I just wanted to ask you, do you support capping carbon emissions?

PALIN: I do. I do.

Time for some more "if the glove don't fit, you must acquit" spin.