Tut, tut!
Although locusts are not animals, I’ll play that game. Locusts and frogs were not used in the judgment of mankind. They were used for specific plagues on a rebellious King and his people. The statement was in relation to judgment on a broader scale as I read it. And if you use that argument you have to show me which of the plagues included skunks and chipmunks because although there were no dinosaurs used in the plagues there were also no warthogs or gerbils...
You raised the point, I pointed out a potential objection. We’re not in any serious level of disagreement, you and I.
Now, if you really want to stir things up, personally I lean to believing that “dinosaurs” were an abomination, not of His creation, and were a target of the Biblical flood, along with the evil, soulless hybrids that genetically engineered them. 1 Enoch recounts this quite well, as do several more oblique references in Canonical books, from Genesis to Numbers. As far as fossils, I’d be interested in seeing just how many have come from known ancient sites of human habitation.