Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Polarik

You have settle this issue with finality. Now, can we get any elected federal oligarchs to do the right thing and go after the original documents of this man’s life? ... The complicit criminality of even the subpreme court tells me no.


71 posted on 04/14/2009 8:05:48 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN; LucyT; Candor7; null and void; seekthetruth; little jeremiah
You have settle this issue with finality. Now, can we get any elected federal oligarchs to do the right thing and go after the original documents of this man’s life? ... The complicit criminality of even the subpreme court tells me no.

Well, I hope that's not the case, but what concerns me is that others are still missing the entire point of this article. Maybe I can illustrate it with a "parable."

Remember Al Capone, the greatest American gangster in history? Was he ever charged for all the murders he committed or ordered, or the $billions he illegally obtained, or the police officers and politicians he bribed or threatened? None. Capone was also well-known for making paper trails disappear. He literally invented the term, "plausible deniability."

In 1931, Capone was charged with contempt for his failure to appear in court in Chicago for questioning about the St. Valentine's Day Massacre.

Because a federal court issued the contempt citation, the FBI became involved in investigating Capone's activities. This led to an intense, years-long inquiry into his business practices. The FBI worked with the Treasury Department and the IRS to dig up enough evidence to convict him of tax evasion. The check he endorsed, along with testimony from a few, brave witnesses, provided enough evidence to send Capone to jail.

The point of the story is that one, seemingly insignificant document, the contempt of court citation, brought down an entire criminal enterprise that ruled Chicago in the 20's and 30's. (POSTSCRIPT: organized crime in Chicago continued to flourish long after Capone was dead and buried. What's up with Chicago?)

If any one of the lawyers (take your pick) who were, or are currently, suing Obama, the DNC, Election Supervisors, Secretaries of State, filing Quo Warrranto requests, whatever, to secure the release of BO's "vault" birth certificate, had done one very simple thing before the election, they could have saved themselves, and everyone else, from having this charade continue:

Do a FOIA to Dr. Alvin Onaka, Hawaii's State Registrar, and to Dr. Chiome Fukino, Hawaii's Direcotr of Health, asking thme to verify whether or not the COLB document shown online was printed and certified by the DOH, on June 6, 2007, by submitting for review, a notarized copy of the receipts and print logs for all COLB's produced on June 6, 2007. They can redact every entry that does not match the one for Obama's COLB. If they are all redacted, then Obama's COLB does not exist, and this becomes prima facie evidence of document fraud that's not "plausibly deniable."

I spoke directly with Onaka on or about June 23 of last year, and I asked him if his office had printed the COLB shown on Obama's website. He said that he wasn't aware of anyone requesting it. That was quickly followed with, "We really cannot confirm or deny that. It's protected information." It's hard to believe that I'm the only one who spoke with him. Everyone else was content to talk to non-managerial staff like Janice Okubo, the Communications Officer. But, I digress.

If a case of document fraud has been committed, and it has, and there are relevant statutes that have been violated, and there are, at both the State and Federal levels, then it should have been a no-brainer to, at least, have it investigated where it began.

Not with President Obama. Not with the State of Hawaii. Not with anyone in government. Auythories need to question the people who are both culpable and accessible, namely his Campaign staff (like Tommy Vietor, Shaun Daly) and the friendly, forgery folk at Factcheck. There's more here than meets the eye.

78 posted on 04/14/2009 9:32:22 AM PDT by Polarik (("Forgeries don't validate claims -- they repudiate them"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson