Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama vindicates Bush, again (on detainees at Guantanamo Bay)
HOTAIR.COM ^ | 4/13/2009 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 04/13/2009 10:23:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

When will Barack Obama apologize to George Bush? He spent the entire campaign impugning Bush’ handling of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, claiming that they required access to federal courts and that military detentions were not necessary. On Friday, Obama took another big step towards Bush by deciding to fight a federal court that essentially endorsed Obama’s views on the campaign trail:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Obama administration said Friday that it would appeal a district court ruling that granted some military prisoners in Afghanistan the right to file lawsuits seeking their release. The decision signaled that the administration was not backing down in its effort to maintain the power to imprison terrorism suspects for extended periods without judicial oversight.

In a court filing, the Justice Department also asked District Judge John D. Bates not to proceed with the habeas-corpus cases of three detainees at Bagram Air Base outside Kabul, Afghanistan. Judge Bates ruled last week that the three — each of whom says he was seized outside of Afghanistan — could challenge their detention in court.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim Geraghty’s axiom applies: All of Obama’s statements come with an expiration date — all of them. That actually is good news for the Right, since we disagree with most of Obama’s statements. This case is a a good example.

Terrorists and insurgents captured by military and intelligence personnel engaged overseas do not get habeas corpus. Not even the Nuremberg defendants got habeas corpus in American courts, the example Obama liked to use (and got wrong) on the campaign trail. Their military tribunals were the final word, as they should be with detainees at Bagram or at Gitmo.

I’m glad to see Obama coming to his senses on this point. This is change I can believe in, but Obama should apologize to Bush in every brief his DoJ files along these lines.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; gitmo; guantanamo; obama

1 posted on 04/13/2009 10:23:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

dominant media.... cricktes

dominant media on the pirates:

GREATEST NAVAL VICTORY IN US HISTORY... OBAMA`S TACTICS WILL BE STUDIED AT THE NAVAL ACADEMY FOR THE NEXT 100 YEARS !!!


2 posted on 04/13/2009 10:27:49 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

*CRICKETS


3 posted on 04/13/2009 10:28:10 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I agree, apologies are in order. Now if he campaigned with these policies - keeping troops in Iraq, this situation in Gitmo, he would have been lined up with the same Bush policies that he bashed. In fact, he wouldn’t have had much of a campaign. Because it wouldn’t have been based on ‘Change’. I listened to a liberal on Fox news yesterday. She said that O is getting intelligence that he didn’t have before. So, Obama is now reading the intelligence Bush had - that Bush made decisions on. It appears that Bush was right after all. And OBama was wrong!


4 posted on 04/13/2009 10:30:53 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

By filing these briefs, Zero *IS* apologizing!

And he dang well knows it too!
LOL!


5 posted on 04/13/2009 10:36:58 AM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HollyB
I sure hope someone at the RNC is planning commercials for the 2010 and 2013 detailing how the Dem's bashed Bush polices when it helped them get elected (and hurt the U.S.) then adopted the polices after actually becoming responsible for getting results.
6 posted on 04/13/2009 11:03:43 AM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
2nd biggest news story of the weekend:

THE OBAMA DOG: HOW CUTE IS IT?

7 posted on 04/13/2009 12:11:47 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randog
THE OBAMA DOG

Her name is Michelle.

8 posted on 04/13/2009 6:35:25 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randog
THE OBAMA DOG: HOW CUTE IS IT?

And true to form, it appears that Obama named it after himself...BO (Barak Obama?)

9 posted on 04/13/2009 11:04:02 PM PDT by highlander_UW (The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson