To: Dosa26
One 50 cal and a trained gunman on the back of the boat could probably sink most of this filth. Of course, it would. However, arms of any kind on a merchant ship are against the UN treaty governing "safe passage".
This treaty seems to be demonstrating -- on an international scale -- how gun control really works.
107 posted on
04/12/2009 11:46:12 PM PDT by
okie01
(THE MAItNSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: okie01
However, arms of any kind on a merchant ship are against the UN treaty governing "safe passage". This treaty seems to be demonstrating -- on an international scale -- how gun control really works. The criminals do what criminals do, ignore laws and prey on the defenceless law-abiders. We never did sign onto the UN "law of the sea" treaty did we? We probably signed onto some stupid similar law screw it extenuating circumstances and such. Hire private security and issue letters of marquee (if thats what they call blanket immunity for suppressing piracy in hot zones)
146 posted on
04/13/2009 6:17:08 AM PDT by
Dosa26
To: okie01
arms of any kind on a merchant ship are against the UN treaty governing "safe passage". Figures the UN would be behind something that stupid. Seems it's time to repudiate that treaty and start protecting our ships.
159 posted on
04/13/2009 10:19:46 AM PDT by
Fast Moving Angel
(There are no points for second place.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson