Are you suggesting that the Times has it in for the Church?
Some 2/3rds or 3/4's of the front-page editors at The New York Times are either homosexual or bisexual, and not very closeted about it. This according to one of their number, who wrote about it openly (by way of bragging about how much "better" things had become).
It was not reported last Sunday, however, that three-quarters of the people who decide what appears on the front page of the New York Times are homosexuals, according to Richard Berke, the paper's National Political Correspondent, a longtime member of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association. [Emphasis added.]
Berke spoke at the 10th anniversary reception for the group in Washington, D.C. on April 12, 2000 at the National Press Club, saying:
"This is at a newspaper where not so long ago -- when I started there 15 years ago -- the department heads were asking for lists of the gay reporters on different sections so they could be punished in different ways. So things have really changed at the newspaper. Since I've been there, there's been a dramatic shift. I remember coming and wondering if there were any gay reporters there or whatever. Now it's like, there are times when you look at the front-page meeting and … literally three-quarters of the people deciding what's on the front page are not-so-closeted homosexuals. … [It is] a real far cry from what it was like not so long ago."
According to those words, the decision to start cheerleading for homosexuality began soon after 1984 when Pinch Sulzberger first arrived at the New York offices. Since then he alone has effected a remarkable transition --- in the paper and in the nation --- as a result of his interference in Massachusetts politics, beginning in 1999. He took full charge of the conglomerate in 1997 when he became Chairman.
Link: Cheerleading New York Times.
And then, lest we forget the kind of garbage we're dealing with, coming from The New York Times, there's this:
NYT Bias Example
"Bush Cheered at Fort Benning: FORT BENNING, Ga.--President Bush, surrounded on Thursday by cheering soldiers in camouflage, defended his decision to send 21,500 more U.S. troops to Iraq and cautioned that the buildup will not produce quick results. 'It's going to take awhile,' he said."--headline and lead paragraph, Associated Press, Jan. 11 [2007]
"Bush Speaks and Base Is Subdued: FORT BENNING, Ga., Jan. 11--President Bush came to this Georgia military base looking for a friendly audience to sell his new Iraq strategy. But his lunchtime talk received a restrained response from soldiers who clapped politely but showed little of the wild enthusiasm that they ordinarily shower on the commander in chief."--New York Times, Jan. 12
“Are you suggesting that the Times has it in for the Church? “
Nothing personal against the Catholic Church. The NYTimes hates any agent of traditional moral values and common decency.