What they did in their scenarios was to show that 2 people, the airsoft guy and the reporter, both of whom had NO experience handling firearms did not perform well in a staged scenario. I fail to see the value in this except for propaganda purposes.
> What they did in their scenarios was to show that 2 people, the airsoft guy and the reporter, both of whom had NO experience handling firearms did not perform well in a staged scenario. I fail to see the value in this except for propaganda purposes.
If that’s what they did, that’s a shame. What a waste of a perfectly good opportunity to run a great scenario. How disappointing. It would have no value at all, not even for propaganda purposes as it would be too easy to debunk.
‘Strewth.