> What they did in their scenarios was to show that 2 people, the airsoft guy and the reporter, both of whom had NO experience handling firearms did not perform well in a staged scenario. I fail to see the value in this except for propaganda purposes.
If that’s what they did, that’s a shame. What a waste of a perfectly good opportunity to run a great scenario. How disappointing. It would have no value at all, not even for propaganda purposes as it would be too easy to debunk.
‘Strewth.
Is this the network that faked the “exploding pick-up truck gas tanks”? Not that it matters; I don’t trust ANY of them to tell the truth...
P.