Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
The faster this welfare program goes broke the better.

The only possible silver lining I see in any of this is that the system(s) will go broke. And then (maybe) America will say "Any politician who promises to use taxpayer funds to solve problems in my life is lying."

Government budgets should cover defense, courts, some transportation infrastructurre, and not much else. The budget should be far less than 50% of its current size -- if we go broke enough, maybe people will understand that.

11 posted on 04/10/2009 10:48:11 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (American Revolution II -- overdue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
RE :”Government budgets should cover defense, courts, some transportation infrastructurre, and not much else. The budget should be far less than 50% of its current size — if we go broke enough, maybe people will understand that.

It will never go broke because fed can create money and the public will not get upset about spending. I would like voters/taxpayers to understand what this program is, redistribution. Democrats want them to think it is a retirement program that they ‘earned’.

Back when Reagan cut the deal in 1980s with democrats it was a crime. To generate a off budget surplus to spend while telling public it was a self funding retirement program with a trust fund. I would NEVER support a tax increase in SS for this reason.

It sounded like GWB was willing to sign a bill raising the FICA tax-CAP on SS for savings accounts (will never know for sure fortunately)

15 posted on 04/10/2009 11:02:19 AM PDT by sickoflibs (RNC Party Theme : "We may be socialists, but they are Marxists!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson