~~~~~~~~~~~
Thus, the original claim that 40,000 years ago, man made his first stone implements was off by over 92 percent, suggesting that evolutionary depictions of human history are unreliable.
That is "snide" -- and is the trademark style of the YEC writers.
Speaking of "misleading", the depiction of a well-crafted Clovis point
in reference to an article discussing rudimentary blade removals -- now, that is "misleading".
~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Snide?" Countering the snideness of the YECArticle was, indeed, my intent.
OTOH, I posted demonstrable (and replicable) facts. (Do you also need me to point out the [both positive and negative] conchoidal fracture remnants resulting from the 120-degree shockwave propagation?)
Please point out where I was "misleading"...