[calcowgirl]

There are two problems here, both created by a willfulness to by critical of Mitt Romney by some of you (who among you supported him in the primary?) ...

I voted for Romney in the primary (not that it has anything to do with the discussion.)

There are more than "two problems" here, none caused by what you posted, IMO.

The problem as I see it is that you continue to not be responsive to what people post, instead imposing your own words and biases on others and misrepresenting their opinions or questions. Take your post, for example. You seem to be responding to post #222 by sickoflibs, but you don't bother to ping him or to address anything he wrote (and this is about the third time I have seen you do this). You continue on with all sorts of unsupported assertions (addressed to the anonymous "you") that do not resemble what was posted ("You are reading and quoting... ", "You never... ", "The problem is you can't read... ", "if you continued along your line... ", "And I'll tell you another thing..." etc).

If you want to have a discussion, you need to start by actually reading and absorbing what the poster is saying, not just launch a tirade against the anonymous "YOU," attributing things to your perceived antagonist that they did not say nor believe.

JMHO

[sickoflibs]

Thanks calcowgirl, very nice response, I was little worried last night, but I know you had a stressful day :)

[mbraynard]

Calcowgirl - I did respond to 222 but I can see it was a cut and paste error on my part in leaving someone off (yet they still seem to be maintaining attention).

My last post started everything back from the beginning - it's an unfair criticism of Romney taken out of context - and no one's responded to it. What's more to add?