[mbraynard]

Calcowgirl - I did respond to 222 but I can see it was a cut and paste error on my part in leaving someone off (yet they still seem to be maintaining attention).

My last post started everything back from the beginning - it's an unfair criticism of Romney taken out of context - and no one's responded to it. What's more to add?

[calcowgirl]

it's an unfair criticism of Romney taken out of context - and no one's responded to it.

It isn't unfair, nor has it gone without response.

If you actually read what people posted on this thread, you would find that you were the third person to post the language included in the original article from The Hill and that several people responded to it, including me. That you posted it again does not mean it warrants an additional response.