On this thead “08bil98z24” has now threated to leave in three seperate posts, and yet here you are again. To quote the old song: “How can I miss you if you never go away?”
Boy, if you keep threatening to leave, eventually you have to follow through on that threat. Otherwise, you just end up looking like an ass. I’m suprised nobody’s told you that before.
On the other hand, if you feel the need to keep bumping my thread and letting people in on the extent of your stupity, be my guest. All of the people posting now are ignoring you and agreeing with my original point (which has nothing to do with you or drugs or whatever pathetic drug habits you have). So I figure its win-win for me. That’s why people post thread here, you know: to make the same point to a lot of people. You partially disagreed with that point in your first post, because you had no clue what you were talking about. I’ve come to expect these types of struggles with logic from libertarians. Especially ones like yourself who obviously haven’t given the concept much thought further than “gee, wouldn’t it be great if pot were legal?”
I agree with your point that spelling and grammer are fairly irrelevant. It is the content that matters. Thanks for sharing. If you truely believe that, why do you keeping looking for spelling errors in my posts? If I gave a rat’s ass about a drug addict, don’t you think I could take the time to hit spell check? On way of looking at it is that those errors have a lot more to say about you than they do about me. But keep looking if you think it helps you argument. It doesn’t. And drugs will be just as illegal when you’re finished.
Finally we get to you’re idea that you’ve so much about me from my post. To behonest, I don’t remember that I was ever hiding anything. Many people on FR know me quite well. I’ve had diner with several of them. Breakfast with a few others. One thing I don’t consider myself to be is a “prefect conservative.” That’s another place where I guess you and I differ. For instance, I don’t accept the party line on immigration. I think illegal immigration is mostly a product of our welfare state. Get rid of it, and there will be far fewer jobs that Americans are unwilling to do.
Also I and most Conservatives I know have no interest in things that are “for the children” as you say. I don’t have kids (see, there’s another thing you know about me), and I don’t know a lot of kids who do drugs. But there I go again worrying about why drugs are illegal. The point is they are. You want to change that, so its up to you to say why. And its not enough to vaguely claim “it’s unconstitutional.” The Supreme Court doesn’t agree with you.
Oh, I almost forgot: When you made those points about what “perfect conservatives” want or don’t want, were you even talking about me, or were you just manufacturing an ideal? Oh wait, there’s that CONTENT thing...
Why write a book? Your silly.
I'm not reading what you write anymore at this point, it appears unfortunately the severe case of diarrhea of the brain you have acquired has really started to affect the CONTENT your posts.
We got rid of Arlene Specter today, now only if we could get rid of YOU, (or you could just come back to reality instead of the fantasy world you are currently living in) the Republican party would be on it's way back to the top.
The War on Drugs is unconstitutional. Limiting one's freedom for the benefit of our children is something Liberals do.
Legalizing drugs is not going to lead to everyone being a drug addict.
Prisons are over crowded with individuals whose only crime was possession. Alcoholics do not go to jail for alcohol, why should a drug addict go to jail for drugs.
Scheduling laws are unconstitutional as they ban certain substances for use by everyone no matter what the reason.
The War on Drugs is a complete disaster, yet knuckle heads like YOU (who are perfect conservatives) think you are saving all of man kind. What is even more pathetic is that so called conservatives such as yourself recycle liberal anti-gun talking points to make an anti-legalization/anti-drug message.
Prohibition did not work. WOD does not work. The difference? Prohibition was constitutional.
Why not put the argument up for a vote? Misguided individuals such as yourself would not allow it ... Fear of popular opinion for legalization is the determining factor.
Do not respond to me again. I will NOT allow you to have the last post/last word. This may be YOUR thread but I'M ending it. Ha.
As for the content of your posts, It's never to late to go back to school. Sentence structure, spelling and grammar do matter in society.
Spell check? Whats that? Perfect Conservatives don't need to spell correctly.
My sympathy goes out to those unfortunate Freepers.
If you don't mind me asking, What was the name of the "diner" you went to?