Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vermont legalizes gay marriage with veto override
Associated Press ^

Posted on 04/07/2009 8:36:25 AM PDT by wk4bush2004

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — Vermont has become the fourth state to legalize gay marriage — and the first to do so with a legislature's vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; homotrolls; samesexmarriage; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-158 next last
To: manc

Where are you from? Not USA judging from your spelling.


81 posted on 04/07/2009 2:27:33 PM PDT by whobeanie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: whobeanie

you’ve just joined this site TODAY and all you can do is go on about spelling

astounding.

How about the homo’s then,do you have something to say about it or not to me?


82 posted on 04/07/2009 2:50:41 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Condorman

we’re fighting a war with the far left right now and we have lost the north east so now we have to take a stand against them.

do you not agree with that?

Do you believe that homo’s should get married?

I ask because is instead of talking about what the thread is about you instead would rather attack me.

Now you might not like what I have said but many others do so be it


83 posted on 04/07/2009 2:53:00 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: manc
Do you believe that homo’s should get married?

Are you suggesting that society should NOT promote stable monogamy between loving couples? Do you have an argument against gay marriage that doesn't boil down to "homos shouldn't marry because it's icky"? Can you tell me exactly how my marriage is worth less because of it?

I ask because is instead of talking about what the thread is about you instead would rather attack me.

I apologize for highlighting your inconsistencies.

84 posted on 04/07/2009 3:13:01 PM PDT by Condorman (Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

The people of Vermont have turned their back on God. The legislature has turned its back on the people, who have opposed this is all polls. The gaystapo figured out how to intimidate lawmakers and got their way.


85 posted on 04/07/2009 3:18:03 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Condorman

loving couples, should society promote this

So do you think that loving couples who are mum and son should marry?
do you think that a man should marry 5 women at the same time?

Do you honestly believe, well you probably do but do you think that a man sticking his penis into another mans arse , a place where his crap comes out is normal or natural?

Your liberal view of these homosexuals does not cut it with the majority of folks in this country.
Toy can come on here and you can go on and on about this loving crap but the fact remains it is not about love at all, it is about your sexual perverted mind/

I love my kids, my family , my dog but I feel no desire to have sex with them
I love my wife but I am still attracted to her sexually so I have sex with her, you know how nature intended.

As for the private business crap you homo’s like to speak about the if it is private, keep your mouth shut, stay in the bedroom , instead of public toilets and stop going on your freak parades


86 posted on 04/07/2009 3:24:48 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Condorman

yes I can tell you how your relationship not marriage is worth less.

I find it quite ironic that you come on here today just to try and think I would some way think you are normal, you’;re not.
You play families while I have a real natural family.

Get used to it

Because quite simply if you were not mentally perverted you are not having sex with the opposite sex but with the same sex.
Tell me , if you are a man are you sticking your penis into a place where the man shoves his crap out of?
Of course you do , something which is not natural at all.

You’re not married, cross state lines and you are nothing but two homo’s having sex, that is it.
Aye you might want to think you are married but you are not.
That is why you are so against letting the people vote on this issue, because you know you are not accepted and that you will never be.

If nature intended for you to have sex with the same sex you would be able to reproduce to keep the human species alive.
You cannot there fore you are doing an unnatural act and quite honestly a sick disgusting act.

You don’t like that view tough I couldn’t care less .

you are sick, you are perverted and you are certainly regarded mentally normal


87 posted on 04/07/2009 3:31:23 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Condorman
Do you have an argument against gay marriage that doesn't boil down to "homos shouldn't marry because it's icky"?

"Gay Marriage" is the "Trojan horse" method of attack by homosexual activists and advocacy groups in the effort to legitimize the perverse behavior of homosexuality in the courts and by legislation. Should homosexual marriage be legalized then by judicial fiat homosexuality would be legitimized across the board. This means that school children by law would be taught that homosexual behavior is a "safe" and "normal" alternative "sexual lifestyle" choice and by law parents will have no grounds to object (regardless of the negative spiritual, moral, psychological, biological, and medical consequences) IOW unconditional approval and acceptance, kowtow or else be hauled in front of a "diversity tribunal" and charged and convicted for hate crimes...

88 posted on 04/07/2009 3:35:13 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

agreed

every kind of sick perverted group should now sue to have their marriage legal and lets see what the homo’s then say about rights

I actually wish they would do this and it would wake people up but of course if groups did do this then it would be the biggest nightmare for the homo’s as they know the public would be calling for a federal amendment


89 posted on 04/07/2009 3:36:38 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

one only has to look at MA and how their agenda is going

now teaching about different couples and families in schools and then trying to get parents not notified about it.

The they are closing down adoption agencies when they could have gone else where instead of catholic adoption services


90 posted on 04/07/2009 3:38:08 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: manc

Is the newbie sending private messages? If so hit the abuse button and alert the mods.


91 posted on 04/07/2009 3:42:00 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I think you’re forgetting who is in power now. I’d be willing to be a significant sum that a Supreme Court, with a 6 to 3 liberal edge after Obama appoints a couple, will ignore previous law and declare that all states must recognize any other state’s marriage. This will take place before the 2016 elections.

By all objective measures, Obama will likely get to replace Stevens and Ginsburg and maybe Souter. If anything those are the three votes for redefining marriage on the Court now. Some of the names that are mentioned as likely Obama appointees (Cass Sunstein for instance) are on record as opposing judicial creation of same-sex "marriage."

Or for that matter, I won’t be surprised if the Court declares prohibition of gay marriage unconstitutional. If the Iowa Supreme Court can do so, why not the US Supreme Court?

Thomas, Alito, Scalia, Roberts and Kennedy.

92 posted on 04/07/2009 3:46:57 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues
What the right side of the culture war needs is a new way of looking at this. Do we defend, or do we come up with a new angle for a court case. Ideas please.

I have an idea. We need to get a couple of token Homos and get them sue in FEDERAL Court to force the recognition of their "marriage." We then take the case all the way to SCOTUS. As constituted now, there is likely a 6-3 majority to uphold traditional marriage. (Thomas, Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, Breyer and Scalia.) A 6-3 opinion from SCOTUS would grind the homosexual agenda to a halt for a long time.

That's why the homosexuals are desperate to keep their litigation out of Federal Court, they know they will lose there. We need to do what the lefties did with Roe and force a case up there now, before any retirements.

93 posted on 04/07/2009 3:53:41 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: whobeanie

Troll.


94 posted on 04/07/2009 4:55:37 PM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Andy'smom

my thoughts too, I must have touched a nerve

Hope all is well with you and your family and how’s it going up there?


95 posted on 04/07/2009 5:41:50 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Constitutional amendment...our founders would be proud!


96 posted on 04/07/2009 7:59:29 PM PDT by Stayfree ((HELP US EXPOSE THE "REAL" BIRTH CERTIFICATE @ REWARD FOR OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.COM!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

The issue of hospital visition is made up. People can designate legally anyone they want to visit them. Anyone can make out their will to anyone they want - people have even left their estate to their pets.


97 posted on 04/07/2009 8:00:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: theknuckler_33; manc

Actually you are completely wrong.

The purpose of the homosexual agenda and the greater leftist social issues agenda of which it is a part have the express and stated purpose of destroying the natural family and traditional moral values, so as to disrupt the social fabric. Then the leftists can control more easily.

Example: you may keep your house and yard neat and clean, but if your entire neighborhood (or even a few neighbors) insist on throwing garbage everhwere, letting their dogs roam and poop everywhere, and so on, even the clean and neat households are bothered.


98 posted on 04/07/2009 8:10:45 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Condorman; manc

The difference is that the homosexual agenda is pernicious and evil, and conservative moral values are the foundation of human civilization.


99 posted on 04/07/2009 8:11:50 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Condorman; manc

Homosexuality is a psychological dysfunction. Homosexuals are mentally ill. Sexual perversion is not normal, natural, healthy or benign. Sodomy should be illegal as it has been throughout history. Homosexuals should not have “special” rights or be noted as a special community or minority. They should be offered help if they want it, and if they don’t want it, they should go back into the closets from whence they came.

Homosexuals should not adopt or foster children, get “married” or be given any special rights.

Manc is not inconsistent; you are promoting leftist hedonist destruction.


100 posted on 04/07/2009 8:14:51 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson