To: MHGinTN
How many times do I have to say this: the POTUS, as head of the executive and CIC doesn’t NEED a security clearance or background check.
To: PhilosopherStones
He does need to be a NBC. No ifs ands or buts.
24 posted on
04/06/2009 4:44:37 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: PhilosopherStones
Um, was O ba ma in the U.S. Senate before running for the presidency? Was he ever given a background check for sensitive material on Senate committees? Take your knee pads off, they’re cutting off blood to your brain.
26 posted on
04/06/2009 4:48:03 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: PhilosopherStones
Say it again and again until the fraud CIC provides proof he is eligible.
73 posted on
04/06/2009 5:23:02 PM PDT by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: PhilosopherStones
How many times do I have to say this: the POTUS, as head of the executive and CIC doesn’t NEED a security clearance or background check. That is correct. Neither do our Imperious Legislators in Congress. Their staffs theoretically do however.
94 posted on
04/06/2009 6:05:39 PM PDT by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: PhilosopherStones
Do you have a reference to back that up? I’ve been looking, and can’t find anything on it.
Thanks.
100 posted on
04/06/2009 6:48:24 PM PDT by
papasmurf
(Trow da' bum out!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson