Skip to comments.
A.P. to Take On Web Aggregators
NYTimes ^
| 4/6/09
| RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
Posted on 04/06/2009 2:34:29 PM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Like this post?
1
posted on
04/06/2009 2:34:29 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
They should be paying us to publish their crap, not the other way around.
To: Nachum
There are always links...right?
3
posted on
04/06/2009 2:36:31 PM PDT
by
madison10
To: Jim Robinson
4
posted on
04/06/2009 2:37:32 PM PDT
by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
To: Nachum
They don’t like their liberal bias and shotty “journalism” being exposed.
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
7
posted on
04/06/2009 2:51:09 PM PDT
by
Vn_survivor_67-68
(CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
To: Nachum
8
posted on
04/06/2009 2:52:15 PM PDT
by
papasmurf
(Trow da' bum out!)
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
reading the AP release carefully makes one wonder if they are losing “members”......
9
posted on
04/06/2009 2:55:36 PM PDT
by
Vn_survivor_67-68
(CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
To: Nachum
good that way there filth will have a more limited circulation.
10
posted on
04/06/2009 3:07:13 PM PDT
by
bilhosty
(Welcome to Eat the Press)
To: Cementjungle
Exactly, and I can do without reading the ap
11
posted on
04/06/2009 3:19:23 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: Nachum
RIAA/SCO model of business.
To: Nachum
They went after FR quite a while ago. As a result, posting AP articles isn’t permitted.
Actually, this violates the “fair use” laws, but I don’t blame Jim Robinson for not wanting to get involved with more lawsuits.
But if they start suing regular news organizations over fair use, they may find that can be expensive for them.
13
posted on
04/06/2009 3:27:18 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Nachum
They can have an 80% share of the advertising revenue generated by this post.
(Lessee: 80% X $0.00 = 0bummer’s IQ)
14
posted on
04/06/2009 3:31:13 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(If Liberals' GOAL was the Destruction of Western Civilization, would their behavior differ?)
To: Nachum
The Asshociated Press is part and parcel of the decline of our country. The sooner it croaks, the better.
15
posted on
04/06/2009 3:34:46 PM PDT
by
Misterioso
(Obama was elected not in spite of his color but because of it.)
To: Nachum
demand that Web sites obtain permission to use the work of The A.P. or its member newspapersHollywood can't keep gigabite video files off the net. They're going to block little bitty TEXT files? It really is a testimony to the pig-headed stupidity of these low-rent clowns. And yes, these are the same folks who think they can dictate what Americans can learn about Commander Zero and his band of crooks.
To: Nachum
WHO, I ask, would be stupid enough to actually PAY for the AP’s CRAP!
17
posted on
04/06/2009 3:46:02 PM PDT
by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
To: Nachum
How long before DUer’s and DKer’s start posting AP garbage here just to bring out AP’s lawyers?
18
posted on
04/06/2009 3:53:35 PM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(Now that the libs are in power dissent is not only unpatriotic, but, it is also racist.)
To: Nachum
19
posted on
04/06/2009 3:54:47 PM PDT
by
John W
To: Nachum
I guess they are just trying to protect their sources. ;-)
20
posted on
04/06/2009 4:02:18 PM PDT
by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson