Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon to end F-22 production
The Hill ^ | April 6, 2009 | Roxana Tiron

Posted on 04/06/2009 10:52:31 AM PDT by jazusamo

In a blow to Lockheed Martin, the Pentagon has decided to purchase to end funding of the F-22 fighter jet.

The decision by Defense Secretary Robert Gates will rouse widespread opposition in Congress and is likely to bog down the 2010 budget approval process, with F-22 supporters maneuvering to secure more money.

The Pentagon will fund four of the radar-evading stealth fighters in the upcoming 2009 emergency war-spending request, but those additional aircraft will do little to keep the production line in Marietta, Ga., open beyond 2011. Lockheed Martin is the main contractor for the F-22, each of which costs about $140 million.

Gates announced the decision at a press conference on the Defense budget on Monday afternoon.

No money will be requested in the fiscal 2010 budget, congressional and industry sources familiar with the budget briefings told The Hill. Gates has been making calls to the chairmen of the congressional defense committees.

The final F-22 of the 183 currently on order will be delivered at the end of 2011. Building another four would keep the line open for only a few months beyond that end date.

Lockheed Martin and its subcontractors, including Boeing, in recent weeks have stepped up their campaign to keep the production line open. They argue that 25,000 people work directly for the 1,000 suppliers of the F-22 in 44 states, and another 70,000 indirectly owe their jobs to this program.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 0bama; 0bamaisfailing; 65grendeldotcom; aerospace; agenda; airdominance; bho44; bhodod; defensespending; f22; gop2010; idiocracy; ignoranceisstrength; lockheedmartin; palin2012; raptor; rookie; secdefgates; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 501-506 next last
To: GBA

“We have a couple of new airplanes, the F-22 (right here, right now) and F-35 (years from entering service), to replace our older, worn and torn airplanes and to keep anyone from thinking we’d be easily rolled. So, of course, congress cancels the F-22.

Stupid, dangerously naive congress. Why is it when congress screws up everyone feels it but them?”

You forget that while qualifications are required to be even a building custodian, ANY IDIOT can become President, Senator or Congressman.....do.

With such low standards to qualify to become President, Senator or Congressman, small wonder we have the incompetent and corrupt elected officials we do.

The USA must be a truly great nation...to survive its leadership....kind of like a patient with numerous malignant cancers surprising the doctors by not dying as quickly as one would have thought.

We end up with corruption like Pelosi’s where she spends $400,000 of taxpayer funds each month to commute between California and Wash D.C. on a military jet (mere mortals would take a commercial jet, if in the 1st class section).

The US Media being as impartial and unbiased as the Pravda of the old USSR is not helping when Obama does with their approval things that if Bush had done them, the US Media would have been calling for tar&feathers.

And mind numbed voters whose voting smarts are almost on level (but slightly below) of a basket of rocks.


441 posted on 04/07/2009 1:13:39 AM PDT by OldArmy52 (Mainstream Media cheered: Ascension of Castro, Chavez and now Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tc45a

“Wonder who China paid off to vote no...”

Well, don’t forget that China OWNS the Clintons.
And may own a chunk of Obama too via large, illegal campaign contributions via the threat of blackmailing them with exposure of their accepting, if not solicitating, illegal monies....a charge, like that of Obama’s birth, that will never be investigated.


442 posted on 04/07/2009 1:18:14 AM PDT by OldArmy52 (Mainstream Media cheered: Ascension of Castro, Chavez and now Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Professor_Leonide

All I’ll say is, the biggest mistake people make is continuing to fight the last war. Either you stay in front technologically or you don’t. The next war won’t be what was planned for. They never are. The better the available tools the better chance there is in adapting them to the new conditions.


443 posted on 04/07/2009 3:35:29 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; All

What happened to “Yes We Can”?


444 posted on 04/07/2009 3:47:08 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Remember this quote that many of us had to look at in college durning the Reagan years?

“It will be a great day when our schools get all the money they need and the air force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber.”

Well it appears that the Marxist-in-Chief did.

This is a sad day for those of us who love this country. Maybe we should hold a bake sale for a fighter f-22 at every tea party….


445 posted on 04/07/2009 4:16:17 AM PDT by dragonfire417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood

The point I’d make is that one F-22 costs less than the bonuses for AIG employees, but it is a successful investment and its returns pay AFTER the investment.


446 posted on 04/07/2009 4:21:11 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (If you haven't read "The Creature from Jekyll Island," you probably don't know what's going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best

A billion is the new million...


447 posted on 04/07/2009 5:29:00 AM PDT by Edgerunner (Second Amendment Spoken Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; tyke
Precisely, furthermore a war with China would most likely be a sea and air war. We're not putting troops in China. Might we fight them on land elsewhere? Sure, but we aren't going to “win” and occupy. We would, hopefully, sink their blue water navy, shrink their air force, and things would go quiet. I'll say again, neither the Chinese nor the Russians want to rule over nuclear debris. Of course we need a Navy and Air Force to do this, something Obama seems intent on destroying.
448 posted on 04/07/2009 5:54:50 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new enviromentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

My father retired here after serving in the USAF for 23+ years and we stayed in the area after living at Hill. I’m still in Clearfield and work at the U of U. Matt


449 posted on 04/07/2009 7:50:54 AM PDT by aegiscg47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: microgood

“I just am wowed by the numbers. I remember F14s were around $20 to $30 million back in the day. Of course, I looked recently at how much it cost to build the latest carrier, and it was over $6B. Yikes.”

To give you a reality check, a shiny new F-18 Super Hornet goes for $55 million (I believe that is the incremental cost not counting development). Inflation is an insidious thing.

The F-22 gives far more than double the capability of the Super Hornet. I’d support a carrier F-22 alongside the Air Force versions.

It’s incredibly shortsighted to cancel a multi-decade program like this based on the current short-term situation. 0bama might also want to reflect on exactly _why_ the Russians and Chinese gave up on competing militarily.


450 posted on 04/07/2009 7:54:46 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“Congress could keep the F22 production line alive by putting it in next years defense bill. It’s has been done many times before when an administration wanted to kill weapon systems.”

GOP 2010! We need a LOT of new seats!


451 posted on 04/07/2009 8:02:16 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

“Our fighters and bombers will all have stealth technology and the STOVAL model that the Marines and Navy will use, gives it Harrier capability to take off and land vertically. I believe the Marine Corps was never even interested in the F-22 and only wanted the F-35.”

The F-35 has mainly frontal stealth, whereas the F-22 is stealthy from all angles. The Raptor has far greater air-to-air capabilities and range, which the Marines don’t need but the Navy could sure use.

The F-22 is intended to be the F-15 to the F-35’s role as the new F-16. We don’t need air superiority fighting the Taliban, but we might well need it against the ChiComs or other modern adversaries. (Hey, if the dollar collapses, all bets are off as to China being our “friend”.)


452 posted on 04/07/2009 8:08:09 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: tyke

“Any war against either of these two nuclear powers would immediately devolve into lobbing hundreds of nukes at each other from long range. Lack of F22s would be the least of our problems at that point.”

War against China is quite possible. China has no way to deliver more than a few nuclear weapons to the US, so if war broke out over Taiwan (not under 0bama, but under the next President in four years or more) it would likely stay conventional.

If we have the political will, we can easily keep Taiwan independent unless too many major weapons systems are cut.


453 posted on 04/07/2009 8:16:17 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

Obama want the military to use only manual type writers with carbon free ribbons in order to write nasty letters of objection to our enemies.

(the first letter should go to obama)


454 posted on 04/07/2009 8:21:46 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Professor_Leonide

“The F-22 is great, but it’s not worth the sticker price and it won’t help us in the War on Terror.”

What War on Terror would that be? Last I heard from this idiotic administration, we’re no longer in one.


455 posted on 04/07/2009 8:23:48 AM PDT by headstamp 2 ("Government is a disease masquerading as it's own cure")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
"And anyone that thinks we will be immune to conventional nuclear attack after he ditches our nukes is fatally shortsighted."

There, fixed it. /sigh

456 posted on 04/07/2009 8:26:45 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This is all Obama, not Gates.


457 posted on 04/07/2009 8:26:46 AM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Wasn’t Gates appointed by Bush?


458 posted on 04/07/2009 8:26:56 AM PDT by guns_for_liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

The only people pround displaying obama biden bumper stickers are people who recieve government handouts and hard line leftists.


459 posted on 04/07/2009 8:30:24 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: PanzerKardinal

That reminds me of the cold war political cartoon with the USSR bear by somebody’s bedside saying, “yes we lied about everything, duh.” or something to that effect.


460 posted on 04/07/2009 8:31:59 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 501-506 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson