Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Chinese Develop Special "Kill Weapon" to Destroy U.S. Aircraft Carriers
U. S. Naval Institute ^ | 3/31/09

Posted on 03/31/2009 9:55:05 AM PDT by Evil Slayer

With tensions already rising due to the Chinese navy becoming more aggressive in asserting its territorial claims in the South China Sea, the U.S. Navy seems to have yet another reason to be deeply concerned.

After years of conjecture, details have begun to emerge of a "kill weapon" developed by the Chinese to target and destroy U.S. aircraft carriers.

First posted on a Chinese blog viewed as credible by military analysts and then translated by the naval affairs blog Information Dissemination, a recent report provides a description of an anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) that can strike carriers and other U.S. vessels at a range of 2000km.

The range of the modified Dong Feng 21 missile is significant in that it covers the areas that are likely hot zones for future confrontations between U.S. and Chinese surface forces.

The size of the missile enables it to carry a warhead big enough to inflict significant damage on a large vessel, providing the Chinese the capability of destroying a U.S. supercarrier in one strike.

Because the missile employs a complex guidance system, low radar signature and a maneuverability that makes its flight path unpredictable, the odds that it can evade tracking systems to reach its target are increased. It is estimated that the missile can travel at mach 10 and reach its maximum range of 2000km in less than 12 minutes.

Supporting the missile is a network of satellites, radar and unmanned aerial vehicles that can locate U.S. ships and then guide the weapon, enabling it to hit moving targets.

(Excerpt) Read more at usni.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarriers; china; chinathreat; killweapon; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
Advanced missile poses substantial new threat for U.S. Navy
1 posted on 03/31/2009 9:55:05 AM PDT by Evil Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer; Jeff Head

Pinging the Dragon. Pinging the Dragon.


2 posted on 03/31/2009 9:55:52 AM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

The Teleprompter in Chief proses an even bigger threat to America.


3 posted on 03/31/2009 9:56:40 AM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Wonder how much of our tecnology we gave to them to make it for us.


4 posted on 03/31/2009 9:57:26 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Chinese Develop Special "Kill Weapon" to Destroy U.S. Aircraft Carriers

Will this affect my stock in Walmart?

I hope people keep shopping there.

:o

5 posted on 03/31/2009 9:57:53 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Guess these idiots, the Chinese, forgot that we have ICBM with Nukes and can hit China anyplace any time. A reminder that fire one of these advance missiles and guess what will happen. Shortest war in history.
6 posted on 03/31/2009 9:59:36 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I’m sympathetic but I think this one (missile) is a rip-off of a Rooski ASBM.


7 posted on 03/31/2009 9:59:37 AM PDT by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Ask the Clintons.


8 posted on 03/31/2009 9:59:42 AM PDT by NoKoolAidforMe (1-20-09--The Beginning of an Error..............1-20-13--Change we can look forward to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

The ASBM is said to be a modified DF-21

9 posted on 03/31/2009 9:59:44 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Because the missile employs a complex guidance system, low radar signature and a maneuverability that makes its flight path unpredictable, the odds that it can evade tracking systems to reach its target are increased. It is estimated that the missile can travel at mach 10 and reach its maximum range of 2000km in less than 12 minutes.

Maneuver? At mach 10? Call me skeptical .

10 posted on 03/31/2009 9:59:51 AM PDT by Sarajevo (You jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
As analyst Raymond Pritchett notes in a post on the U.S. Naval Institute blog:

"The Navy's reaction is telling, because it essentially equals a radical change in direction based on information that has created a panic inside the bubble. For a major military service to panic due to a new weapon system, clearly a mission kill weapon system, either suggests the threat is legitimate or the leadership of the Navy is legitimately unqualified. There really aren't many gray spaces in evaluating the reaction by the Navy…the data tends to support the legitimacy of the threat."

We live in interesting times.

11 posted on 03/31/2009 9:59:58 AM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

This is different from the Sunburn anti-ship missiles they’ve brought from the Russians?


12 posted on 03/31/2009 10:00:06 AM PDT by agere_contra (So ... where's the birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

If it’s traveling at mach 10, does it need a warhead?


13 posted on 03/31/2009 10:00:46 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 71 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

A supersonic nuclear tipped cruise missle (or really about 10 of them flying togther, perhaps in waives) would easily wipe out any carrier group.


14 posted on 03/31/2009 10:00:50 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoKoolAidforMe

Klintons may have started it but it continued right through the last administration into this one.


15 posted on 03/31/2009 10:01:36 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Yes.


16 posted on 03/31/2009 10:01:45 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 71 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

They use the “kill” weapon and the country is vaporized by one Trident missle carrying sub . 16 warheads acan ruin your whole day .


17 posted on 03/31/2009 10:02:04 AM PDT by Renegade (You go tell my buddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

I agree with you but one must remember who is the Commander in Chief these days. Would he have the guts to use a nuke?


18 posted on 03/31/2009 10:03:01 AM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Clinton, the gift that keeps on giving.


19 posted on 03/31/2009 10:04:02 AM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Klintons may have started it but it continued right through the last administration into this one.”

This is why the Chinese no longer are interested in military cooperation. They now have all the information they need.


20 posted on 03/31/2009 10:04:10 AM PDT by headstamp 2 ("Government is a disease masquerading as it's own cure")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson