Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hiding a Mountain Of Debt
Washington Post ^ | March 29, 2009 | David S. Broder

Posted on 03/29/2009 5:53:50 PM PDT by reaganaut1

With a bit of bookkeeping legerdemain borrowed from the Bush administration, the Democratic Congress is about to perform a cover-up on the most serious threat to America's economic future.

That threat is not the severe recession, tough as that is for the families and businesses struggling to make ends meet. In time, the recession will end, and last week's stock market performance hinted that we may not have to wait years for the recovery to begin.

The real threat is the monstrous debt resulting from the slump in revenue and the staggering sums being committed by Washington to rescuing embattled banks and homeowners -- and the absence of any serious strategy for paying it all back.

The Congressional Budget Office sketched the dimensions of the problem on March 20, and Congress reacted with shock. The CBO said that over the next 10 years, current policies would add a staggering $9.3 trillion to the national debt -- one-third more than President Obama had estimated by using much more optimistic assumptions about future economic growth.

As far as the eye could see, the CBO said, the debt would continue to grow by about $1 trillion a year because of a structural deficit between the spending rate, averaging 23 percent of gross domestic product, and federal revenue at 19 percent.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho44; bhobudget; bhocbo; bhodeficit; broder; cbo; coverup; davidbroder; debt; deficit; federalspending; nationaldebt
Broder makes some good points, but he and the CBO are ignoring the fact that Obama's agenda, including

(1) cap-and-trade, causing energy prices to "skyrocket" (2) card check, pushing workers into unions (3) amnesty for illegal aliens, causing an unending flow of less-educated people to the U.S.

could cause the economy to never recover, making the deficit even worse than they predict.

1 posted on 03/29/2009 5:53:50 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I liked the article, but the digs at the Bush administration are irrelevant.


2 posted on 03/29/2009 6:09:32 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video0...com/glennbeck/


3 posted on 03/29/2009 6:13:56 PM PDT by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Page Cannot Be Found


4 posted on 03/29/2009 6:15:51 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

Opens for me. Must be your browser or Active X controls/


5 posted on 03/29/2009 6:21:48 PM PDT by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
I liked the article, but the digs at the Bush administration are irrelevant

Oldtime pissy liberals like David Broder just can't help themselves. The Depends generation.

6 posted on 03/29/2009 6:35:17 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“They borrowed it from George W. Bush, who turned to it as soon as his inherited budget surpluses withered with the tax cuts and recession of 2001-02.”

Not so fast. The Clinton budget surplus withered as a result of the Clinton stock market burst (April 2000) of the Clinton tech bubble (1998 to 2000). This was followed by the the Clinton recession (two consecutive quarters of of declining GDP starting in year 2000), which was officially declared when the numbers came in 40 days after Bush took office in 2001. The economy didn’t turn around until AFTER the Bush tax cuts took effect in year 2003. Tax revenues actually increased after the Bush tax cuts, because due to the economic turn - around, the government had more wages and business profits to tax. All this in spite of 9-11 and the Iraq war.

Too bad that after a moment of honesty, MSM reporters are required to perform penance by throwing in a gratuitous declaration of political correctness. Otherwise a good article.


7 posted on 03/29/2009 7:07:04 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: haroldeveryman

If George Bush spent as much as Obama did to contain the 2001-02 recession, the MSM would have been howling from the rooftops. Now, with a few exceptions, they characterize it as necessary and are mum on the consequences.

One has to wonder what it is we’re counting on. Personally, I think the Dems think the more goodies they can hand out, the more power they’ll accumulate. So far they’ve been right. Its very short term thinking, but they probably feel they’ve got everyone who is anyone in their pocket.


8 posted on 03/29/2009 7:30:12 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I think butt head broder was writing of what has happened, and not speculating, and when you have a—hole’s like fred barns pushing number three who knows what will happen. It can only go down hill from here.


9 posted on 03/29/2009 8:06:16 PM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Broder 's such a suck up.

He started this piece out trashing Bush - hoping and praying that his "trash Bush" will get a pass for daring to speak poorly of King Obama.

Can anyone recall ONCE when Broder trashed a dem in the first sentence so he could cushion criticism against a Republican?

10 posted on 03/29/2009 8:21:41 PM PDT by GOPJ (Global Warming Hoax - Sucker Science In Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Broder does a MSM suck-up in the first sentence - but other than that there’s some interesting stuff.


11 posted on 03/29/2009 8:23:09 PM PDT by GOPJ (Global Warming Hoax - Sucker Science In Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Border is not smart enough to even be wrong.


12 posted on 03/29/2009 10:14:24 PM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I thought Broder shuffled off this mortal coil years ago...


13 posted on 03/29/2009 10:42:38 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis
Broder’s a smart guy - he's just a liberal MSM dem who's lost his knee pads. Liberals use knee pads when they grovel before dem politicians. Broder must have misplaced his. I'm sure it's temporary.
14 posted on 03/30/2009 4:52:25 AM PDT by GOPJ (Global Warming Hoax - Sucker Science In Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
RE “and the absence of any serious strategy for paying it all back

Or any strategy. Did you hear the phrase “We cant borrow our way out of debt” ?? That is exactly the Keynesian strategy that Obama and the MSM has the public sold on(republicans are not much better). It is that we must combat each recession with more national debt to avoid a depression. This is a disastrous strategy but it is the strategy of ‘immediate action’ which is the news cycle.

15 posted on 03/30/2009 4:56:07 AM PDT by sickoflibs (RNC Party Theme : "We stand for nothing but we're not as bad as Pelosi !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson