In post 496 all you did was make more unsubstantiated claims, followed by your statement that you don’t need no steenkin’ source. And you’ve called that diarrhea a “source” several times since then. You were funny for a little while, but you’ve become boring. You’re a one trick pony.
What I said was that I already knew the truth, the Quantcast link was already in my favorites but Jim posted it first because I wanted for people to just think for a little bit about common sense before the argument was settled by statistics.
National Review Online, 84% male-http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:nF3O3flNxVIJ:www.nationalreview.com/mediakit/2006_Advertising_NRO.pdf+male+readership+demographics+%22national+review%22&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
The Weekly Standard, 79% male-http://www.weeklystandard.com/advertising/demographics.asp
The Drudge Report, 78% male- http://www.intermarkets.net/assets/PDF/drudgeReport.pdf
Time, 2 million more male readers-http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2004/narrative_magazines_audience.asp?cat=3&media=7
Newsweek, 2 million more male readers-http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2004/narrative_magazines_audience.asp?cat=3&media=7
US News & World Report, 3 million more readers-http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2004/narrative_magazines_audience.asp?cat=3&media=7
Politico male demo.-http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13311.html
Talk/polital radio- about 66% male-http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2008/narrative_radio_talk_radio.php?cat=6&media=10
Rush Limbaugh, majority male-http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/02/rush_limbaugh_whos_really_list.html
freerepublic, majority male-http://www.quantcast.com/freerepublic.com