What I said was that I already knew the truth, the Quantcast link was already in my favorites but Jim posted it first because I wanted for people to just think for a little bit about common sense before the argument was settled by statistics.
National Review Online, 84% male-http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:nF3O3flNxVIJ:www.nationalreview.com/mediakit/2006_Advertising_NRO.pdf+male+readership+demographics+%22national+review%22&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
The Weekly Standard, 79% male-http://www.weeklystandard.com/advertising/demographics.asp
The Drudge Report, 78% male- http://www.intermarkets.net/assets/PDF/drudgeReport.pdf
Time, 2 million more male readers-http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2004/narrative_magazines_audience.asp?cat=3&media=7
Newsweek, 2 million more male readers-http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2004/narrative_magazines_audience.asp?cat=3&media=7
US News & World Report, 3 million more readers-http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2004/narrative_magazines_audience.asp?cat=3&media=7
Politico male demo.-http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13311.html
Talk/polital radio- about 66% male-http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2008/narrative_radio_talk_radio.php?cat=6&media=10
Rush Limbaugh, majority male-http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/02/rush_limbaugh_whos_really_list.html
freerepublic, majority male-http://www.quantcast.com/freerepublic.com
What do demographics for other sites have to do with anything? Why are you back to claiming quantcast as your source, after saying that you lied when you claimed it as your source before? You can’t decide which lie to tell from one minute to the next. I know it’s April Fool’s Day, but you’re taking it to the extreme. And no one is fooled by you.