Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x
If women couldn't vote you'd see a different kind of Democrat Party, more Andrew Jackson and less John Kerry.

And your point? I think that would be a very good thing.

Maybe I misunderstand the point you are trying to make.

I mean would that be a bad thing to you?
353 posted on 03/30/2009 3:22:20 PM PDT by OneVike (Just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: OneVike
Maybe I misunderstand the point you are trying to make.

My point was that Coulter's comment -- "if women couldn’t vote, we’d never see a Democrat in the White House again" -- wasn't very well thought out and couldn't literally be true.

Of course it was meant more as a one-liner, but if you take it seriously it doesn't reflect how parties actually behave most of the time.

About your controversy: you can say that giving women the vote made things worse and debased the electorate.

But if one gives a vote to all adult males, one can't rightly deprive equally or unqualified adult females of the same right.

To take the vote away from this or that group creates a precedent for disenfranchising one's own group.

I'm not uncomfortable with a widely distributed franchise. It may make for some problems, but taking the vote away from people would probably be worse.

357 posted on 03/30/2009 3:39:36 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson