Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Syncro
The God of the Bible, not the God of the Bible scholars that cannot agree on what God is.

And yes, I believe you are following one of the teachings of some good man who studied the bible and got a different answer from another good man who also studied the Bible.

817 posted on 03/29/2009 11:48:55 PM PDT by fproy2222 (ex W.A.S.P., now a member of God's living Church)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 809 | View Replies ]


To: fproy2222
Well, I explained that to you already.

How many times must you be told that what I learned I learned from the writings of your LDS church before you will quit deceiving yourself and inferring that I am a liar?

You semantical game of "The God of the Bible, not the God of the Bible scholars that cannot agree on what God is" is just for distraction.

Let me state this:

When you post "The God of the Bible" as you did, you realize in the context I sent it to you it could ONLY mean the God of the Bible, and not a god that used to be a man.

So if as you state, you believe in the God of the Bible, then you do not believe in a god that used to be a man.

825 posted on 03/30/2009 12:07:10 AM PDT by Syncro (Qui non intelligit, aut taceat, aut discat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson