How many times must you be told that what I learned I learned from the writings of your LDS church before you will quit deceiving yourself and inferring that I am a liar?
You semantical game of "The God of the Bible, not the God of the Bible scholars that cannot agree on what God is" is just for distraction.
Let me state this:
When you post "The God of the Bible" as you did, you realize in the context I sent it to you it could ONLY mean the God of the Bible, and not a god that used to be a man.
So if as you state, you believe in the God of the Bible, then you do not believe in a god that used to be a man.
++++
I need to be careful, I let my anger at p flow over to you.
I was not trying to infer you were lieing.
I was trying to explain that I have found that too many good men have come up with too many different ideas of what God meant in the Bible for me to be willing to guess at which “God of the Bible” people mean when they say that to me.
I did a poor job of explaining that.