I caught this more recently then my last message, and wanted to reply to it:
I do also have to say I wasn’t calling Mormons “morons.” I should’ve realized that other people have called Mormons morons because of the similarity of the two letters comprising each word. Please know that was not my intention at all. Now I’m embarrassed for having written that after writing to you not to accidentally antagonize! Maybe the spelling similarity prompted my head to come up with “moron” faster than “idiot,” but please know I only meant that one poster, certainly not Mormons.
I also wrote post #530 to you; Restornu pointed out an embarrassing slip-up of mine. I didn’t know if you would, like Restornu, interpret my use of the word “moron” to refers to Mormons. It absolutely wasn’t, and I regret that the word has ever been used on FR to mock the word, “Mormon,” or the name, “Moroni.”
I also wrote post #530 to you; Restornu pointed out an embarrassing slip-up of mine. I didn’t know if you would, like Restornu, interpret my use of the word “moron” to refers to Mormons. It absolutely wasn’t, and I regret that the word has ever been used on FR to mock the word, “Mormon,” or the name, “Moroni.”
I only meant to call the assertion that anti-Mormons were the authors of Mormon caucus posts idiotic. I summoned you guys to my post because you were the ones I was defending (albeit for my own rhetorical purposes) from that ludicrous charge.
I believe you some try to be tricky when they post but now it seems to be accepted to do and I am puzzled as to why?
No your correspondence has been very cordial something I am not use too!:)