Barack Hussein Obama is a committed Marxist -- what are Americans going to do about it?

Renew America ^ | March 2009 | Marie Jon

[AJ in NYC]

On Nov. 5, 2008, Americans woke up to a very real Marxist coup — although most didn't realize it. I sat down and cried while a huge crowd gathered and were cheering. I intuitively knew something was very wrong. After watching Barack Hussein Obama destructively pursue his agenda as president, I now understand why.

Most Marxist coups rely on deception — and that was certainly true of this one. Just about everything Obama said during the campaign was a calculated lie. His handlers and key supporters were equally willing to lie and deceive to gain advantage.

Once Marxists seize power through deception, manipulation, exploitation, and corrupt interference with the political process, they never give it up. It is entirely possible that we will never see the end of the current regime of Marxists in America. In 20 years, the President of the United States might still be a man named Barack Obama. At the very least, we can expect Obama and his fellow conspirators to do everything in their power to ensure that outcome.

[AJ in NYC]

SHOW YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE MR. SEOTORO!

[rockabyebaby]

Attention: HUSSEIN

[exist]

I heard JC Watts and Mitt Romney on Sean Hannity, they refused to call Obama a socialist. Sean Hannity said but he X, Y, and Z! And they said "Well...I dunno...he's definitley liberal" (paraphrasing)

So to answer your question, they will probably reelect him.

[ryan71]

We are now in the 2-5 year “destabilization stage”.

[ryan71]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2307456730142665916

[Oldpuppymax]

Hussein will serve no more than 2 terms.

[Paladin2]

"Hussein will serve no more than 2 terms."

At last! A positive thought.

[sourcery]

When most Americans can’t coherently define what Marxism and/or socialism is, let alone explain what their own political philosophy happens to be, what do you expect them to do about it?

[ETL]

"The Communist Party USA views the 2008 elections as a tremendous opportunity to defeat the policies of the right-wing Republicans and to move our country in a new progressive direction.

The record turnout in the Democratic Presidential primary races shows that millions of voters, including millions of new voters, are using this election to bring about real change. We wholeheartedly agree with them."

http://cpusa.org/article/articleview/907/1/4/
_____________________________________________________

A Landslide Mandate For Change

Congratulations on an extraordinary history making election!

We can think back with pride to decades of hard work toward our strategic goal of a big enough, broad enough and united enough labor and all-people’s movement that could overcome the ultra-right blockage to all progress. That all people’s movement has come to life, it is dynamic and it has the potential to keep growing.

The election of Barack Obama and a strengthened Congress creates new conditions in our country. There is now the possibility to shift gears and move forward. This new day requires us to further develop our tactics in order to continue to deepen and broaden labor and people’s unity.

There are thousands of experiences that we all have had in these momentous days, some large, some small, all of which express the enormity of change in thinking and readiness for involvement that is underway and that steels us for the battles ahead.

The tears of joy we all shared as crowds gathered to watch the election results here and throughout the world dramatize the new moment we are in.

http://cpusa.org/article/articleview/991/1/154/
_____________________________________________________

Saul Alinsky on "Change"...
From Rules for Radicals, Alinsky outlines his strategy in organizing, writing:

"There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution."

Saul Alinsky, The Latter Rain (LatterRain.com is a "Liberation Theology" commie-left website -etl)
http://latter-rain.com/ltrain/alinski.htm
_____________________________________________________

"Barack Obama told supporters that
'change has come to America' as he
claimed victory in a historic presidential election."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/04/election.president/index.html

[Uncle Sham]

We the people must DEMAND that OUR Constitution be enforced. Section three of the twentieth Amendment is plain as day. The President elect is REQUIRED to "qualify" before being allowed to serve as President. When was this "qualification"? Where did it take place? To whom was it given? We the People have a right to know.

If this "qualification" was not executed, we currently have no President. In addition, if this qualification did not occur, anyone who took an oath to support the Constitution is duty bound to support the Constitution or is breaking the law. This oath alone gives them "standing" to demand justice.

[C210N]

Paraphrased from a previous post of mine on 1984 compared with Brave New World:

1984 is more akin to the kind of monstrosity government in N. Korea and the USSR, where government is overtly repressive. To get a view of where we are headed, you might read Brave New World. This is a view where people actively bring upon the very technologies that destroy them.

From "Amusing Ourselves to Death", I quote: "What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny ‘failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.’ In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us.”

[Emile]

This country is toast -- unless patriots are willing to alter or abolish their government by whatever means necessary. The socialism we are seeing implemented today will never be rolled back peacefully. Such government expansions never are. I expect that, in a decade or so, what's left of the country will be some type of cross between a European command economy and a banana republic (due to all the blatant, unapologetic corruption on the part of those elected to represent us).

I'm tired of warning the idiots out there about all this. If they want all this, they'll have it. They'll find out, sooner or later, that they would have rather had the old system. By then, it'll be too late.

When it no longer suits my purposes, I'll cease to support the socialist state entirely. I'll drop out to the extent necessary, if for nothing else than to not give the Marxists the satisfaction of my support, even tacitly.

I, personally, am expendable. However, I cry for people bringing up kids in this generation. They are the ones that will really have it bad. They have no idea how bad yet. If anyone will take the country back, it'll be those patriot parents with a stake in this game other than themselves. I hope to be able to fight alongside them. But if not, I'll passively resist in my own way until the end.

[Salvey]

Hussein will serve no more than 2 terms.

...no more than 2 years.

[clamper1797]

The socialism we are seeing implemented today will never be rolled back peacefully.

This is EXACTLY and ABSOLUTELY correct

[MrLee]

“When most Americans can’t coherently define what Marxism and/or socialism is, let alone explain what their own political philosophy happens to be, what do you expect them to do about it?”

Thank their teachers.......

[Cheetahcat]

Committed Marxist is that therm for Mass-murderer also?

[Canedawg]

No doubt.

He just didnt exactly specify what the change was he was going to bring- they let people superimpose their own idea on what change meant. And the clip with Joe the Plumber confirmed it for anyone who was interested and PAYING ATTENTION.

The opposition- most of it anyway- knew exactly what he was talking bout. And we’re moving toward progressivism now.

[gidget7]

AMEN to that!

We need to demand that like the “Don't Tread On Me” (as a flag says, Don't Tread On Our Constitution”

It's OUR Constitution Folks-Use it or lose it!

[mcshot]

Interesting that yet another part of our “checks and balances” system goes unchecked. I’m genuinely sickened by the lack of effort our career politicians have put into protecting this Country.