You continue to claim there is no evidence after I gave you the evidence you originally asked for, of one species becoming two different species, so yes, there is evidence.
I have also explained I don’t know everything there is to know about it,
If you don’t know enough about it, then how can you assert that the theory of evolution is wrong? It sounds like you have made your decision on other grounds than the actual evidence.
but what I do know is that there is little to no current evidence of any past species to species change.
I have already given you current evidence of species change.
Let’s discount the fossil record.
No, I won’t “discount the fossil record,” as it’s powerful evidence supporting the theory of evolution. Why do you want to discount good evidence?
Number one, the fossil record does not support evolution... number two I’m not discounting because it is less supportive. You can make more of an argument with something that doesn’t exist because you can make it up as you go along.
I don’t know how to rephrase the question so you understand what I’m asking. I want to know how you support evolution with so many species and not a single thing to fill the millions and millions of gaps. You answered my original question and I have acknowledged that in every post yet you still ignore the central issue: Fill in the gaps... seems like a simple task.