Ping!
Yet another proof of the utter failure of Darwinistas.
Ok. But I bet you won’t see goats and sheep hunting down coyotes anytime soon.
Ya gotta be fast to outrun a Texas tumbleweed.
Okay, how do you explain El Chupacabra? / sarc (snicker)
The most functional metric in studying the different biologies of predators and herbavores is the length of the digestive tract. This is because soft raw flesh needs to be digested as quickly as possible and then eliminated before putrifaction occurs, while an herbaceous diet requires a much longer digestive process to break down the tough plant material adequately enough to extract it's nutritious qualities. And indeed, predators have much shorter diegstive tracts than the much longer digestive tracts of herbavores, while omnivores have digestive tract lengths between the two extremes (the metric beign established by the calculation of a ratio of body length to digestive tract length). These differences are mandatory for survival, and constitute clear proof of the operation of form and function rather than mere behavior. Whether evolution caused these differences is another question, but denying their existence and importance is simply ignorance.
In nature you are the eater or the eaten.
I am a God-fearing Catholic. Evolution is not incompatible with Christianity. The 6000 year people make all Christians look like idiots.
Evol-ers crack me up! :-)
Some people think you have to go to some middle eastern hellhole to find ignorant religious zealonts that preach their way or the highway.
I’m starting to come around to the notion that there must be a creationist gene. I don’t understand its evolutionary purpose, but it sure short circuits the brain.