Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer
And of course there is no research to back up the conclusion.

Uhm, as he stated clearly, his conclusion was based on claims of Jesus and others in the Bible. It turns out, the veracity of such claims have indeed been a subject of study for thousands of years.

Now if you have some philosophical pre dispositions toward naturalism, and thus reject such claims out of hand, that is your choice. But don't confuse your philosophical assumptions with scientific discovery unless you can test them scientifically.

20 posted on 03/27/2009 5:08:38 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: AndyTheBear

“his conclusion was based on claims of Jesus and others in the Bible.”

No they aren’t. If he truly believed in Jesus and the Bible, he’d not try to make his faith sound like science.

Mr. MS himself has a crisis of confidence. he lacks faith.

He thinks that if he doesn’t add science (as good he can understand it) to back up his faith that somehow he is being heretical. Mr. MS has no science, and he has no faith. Mr. MS is a true agnostic through incompetence. He is a man with nothing.

Lots of you Creatards on these threads are just incompetent Christians and incompetent scientists. Like Mr. M.S. you have nothing, so you attempt to gain grace through science. How stupid, really. Grace doesn’t work that way.

Isn’t it ironic that an engineer had to explain that to all you scientifically illiterate faithless fools that claim the mantle of Christianity.


25 posted on 03/27/2009 6:12:47 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson