Posted on 03/27/2009 7:44:01 AM PDT by Born Conservative
The state Supreme Court on Thursday approved a judge’s recommendation that would erase the criminal records of all juveniles charged with certain minor offenses who appeared before Judge Mark Ciavarella over a five-year period.
The recommendation came from Senior Judge Arthur Grim, who was appointed as a master by the Supreme Court on Feb. 11 to review cases that were heard by Ciavarella.
Ciavarella is awaiting sentencing on a guilty plea for accepting kickbacks in exchange for decisions and rulings that led to use of two privately owned juvenile detention centers.
Ciavarella’s attorney, Al Flora, declined comment.
Thursday’s decision covered the cases of juveniles charged with minor summary offenses and certain low-level misdemeanors, according to the court. Grim will conduct a separate review of cases involving more serious offenses.
“We’re absolutely thrilled,” said Lourdes Rosado, of the Juvenile Law Center, a nonprofit agency that filed petitions that led to the Supreme Court’s appointment of Grim.
The expungements apply to juveniles who appeared before Ciavarella without an attorney and who were charged with offenses like shoplifting, graffiti and theft under $200, Rosado said.
Grim also set other conditions to qualify for expungement, such as requiring that the offense stem from a single incident and excluding repeat offenders.
The number of juveniles who fall into this category won’t be known until the records are reviewed, but estimates have ranged in the hundreds.
Unrepresented juveniles and their families deserve this opportunity to “wipe the slate clean,” Rosado said.
“It’s a very big deal. It’s eliminating records that future employers, governments and schools can get access to. Those records can impede kids in getting financial aid for college and getting employment,” Rosado said.
Rosado said juveniles who had more serious charges should not lose hope.
“I want to emphasize that this is the first round,” Rosado said. “The court emphasized that this is the first step in a process.”
Grim said in his recommendation report that a “very substantial number” of juveniles appeared without legal counsel before Ciavarella without “knowingly and intelligently” waiving their right to counsel.
“My investigation has also uncovered evidence that there was routine deprivation of children’s constitutional rights to appear before an impartial tribunal and to have an opportunity to be heard,” Grim wrote.
If that hadn’t happened, the “vast majority” of the cases would have resulted in lesser sanction, which would have allowed the juveniles to get their records erased, he said.
Grim had the option to recommend new hearings, but he said re-litigating the cases wouldn’t serve the community or victims. Prompt action will help right the wrong and restore confidence in the justice system, he wrote.
County President Judge Chester Muroski said he believes Grim made wise use of the “extraordinary power” he was given by the Supreme Court.
“He’s exercising that power in a very reasonable fashion, saving many of these families the additional inconvenience and trauma of having to appear in court,” Muroski said.
Grim’s plan relies heavily on input from the Juvenile Law Center and Luzerne County District Attorney’s Office regarding which records should be expunged.
County District Attorney Jackie Musto Carroll said the review of juvenile records will be a mammoth task, but her office welcomes the assignment. She said she may need to request additional temporary staff from county commissioners or the state.
“We want to get to the bottom of this and do everything we can as quickly as possible to see that justice is served,” she said.
The Law Center and District Attorney’s Office will review thousands of records from Jan. 1, 2003, to May 31, 2008, according to the order.
Security measures will be put in place to make sure the records remain confidential.
At the Law Center, only four people will be permitted to view the records – Rosado, another attorney and two support personnel. Two attorneys and two support personnel will be provided access from the District Attorney’s Office.
Grim must approve all copying of records, and all records must be stored in a locked file cabinet or restricted location when they’re not being reviewed.
These judges should never again see the outside of a prison.
In Cal, we don't "erase" the records, we seal them. Can only be opened by court order. IIRC.
I live a couple of counties away from there. They should never see the light of day again. I do agree.
In Cal, we don't "erase" the records, we seal them. Can only be opened by court order. IIRC.
I'm for giving juveniles a second chance, but if they become adults who continue to commit crimes, their juvenile records should be open especially when it comes to deciding punishment.
...Sisamnes, whose father King Cambyses slew and flayed, because that he, being of the number of the royal judges, had taken money to give an unrighteous sentence. Therefore Cambyses slew and flayed Sisamnes, and cutting his skin into strips, stretched them across the seat of the throne whereon he had been wont to sit when he heard causes. Having so done Cambyses appointed the son of Sisamnes to be judge in his father's room, and bade him never forget in what way his seat was cushioned.
--Herodotus
This case involves juveniles whose cases were adjudicated without any notification by the judges that the defendants had the right to be represented by legal counsel.
And these juveniles were sentenced to serve time in privately-owned (and government-funded) "youth offender facilities" whose owners paid somewhere between $2 and $3 million in kickbacks to the judges who sent the kids to these facilities.
Can you imagine the uproar and utter outrage that is going to be caused when one of these juvenile offenders murders somebody or commits a mass murder or runs amok killing folks and then it comes to light their juvenile record has been expunged. There will be political hell to pay count on it. Judicial activism at its worst. See what you get when you elect a bunch of far left bleeding heart liberals into positions of power.
Obviously, the fact that these sentences were tainted by the judge’s corruption makes them a special case.
When "the system" f#%&s up this badly, there is no way to render justice without dismissing the charges and expunging the records.
Read the details of the case. The entire episode is a f#%&ing disgrace.
There was a local TV/Radio simulcast in Luzerne County last night discussing this. A lawyer that was on said that the normal prison placement for Fed prisoners is within 500 miles, which would be anywhere from Indiana to the west, and Maine to the North. However, due to the fact that they are judges, they will most likely be sent “far away”.
Personally, I think the sentence they got is light, in comparison to how many lives they’ve ruined.
Remember the story of that pedophile priest Geoghan from Boston -- who molested hundreds of kids over the course of his adult life.
Mr. Geoghan was beaten to death in prison by one of his former victims.
I agree. Something like this should equate to the level of treason. Using their office, the public trust, to not only enrich themselves, but to do it by jailing kids without counsel is about as low as it gets.
The expungements apply to juveniles who appeared before Ciavarella without an attorney and who were charged with offenses like shoplifting, graffiti and theft under $200, Rosado said.
Grim also set other conditions to qualify for expungement, such as requiring that the offense stem from a single incident and excluding repeat offenders...
Grim said in his recommendation report that a “very substantial number” of juveniles appeared without legal counsel before Ciavarella without “knowingly and intelligently” waiving their right to counsel.
“My investigation has also uncovered evidence that there was routine deprivation of children’s constitutional rights to appear before an impartial tribunal and to have an opportunity to be heard,” Grim wrote.
I live in an adjacent county, but grew up in Luzerne County. The only thing new here is that they got caught (thankfully).
In Cal, you get your record sealed if you have a good discharge from the youth autority or probation. However, they don't reopen for future offenses. I think that should be added.
Most of our juvenie laws were set in the early 40s when things were much milder and under control. Juveniles who were truants and so forth (601 offenses) we sentenced to the youth authority. That hasn't been true since the early 70s.
Nice!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.