Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keyes to appeal case on Obama's eligibility
http://www.worldnetdaily.com ^ | March 26, 2009 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/26/2009 9:12:59 PM PDT by luv2ndamend

A lawsuit filed on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes, a candidate for president on California's general election ballot last year, challenging President Obama's eligibility to hold office under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution will be appealed, according to a lawyer working on the case. WND reported earlier on the case being filed and then again when a judge dismissed it after concluding apparently anyone can run for president on the California ballot – whether or not they are eligible under the Constitution of the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Getting interesting.
1 posted on 03/26/2009 9:12:59 PM PDT by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend

Is this Gary Kreeps case. Keyes is a good man.


2 posted on 03/26/2009 9:20:02 PM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend; 1000 silverlings; pnh102; rxsid; seekthetruth; hoosiermama; Red Steel; ...

Ping!


3 posted on 03/26/2009 9:21:07 PM PDT by luv2ndamend (May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. — Samue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
"Although petitioners allege that documents, statements or other lawsuits raise questions about whether President Obama is a natural born citizen, it does not allege that either the President or the Vice President has failed to perform any mandatory duty under either state or federal law. The allegation that “it is incumbent on the candidates to present the necessary documentation confirming his or her eligibility” (FAP, par. 68) is insufficient to satisfy the pleading requirements for a petition for writ of mandate."

In other words, since there are no standards for establishing eligibility, Barack's failure to prove his eligibility is no bar. Why even bother with the Constitution anymore?

4 posted on 03/26/2009 9:28:58 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Exactly...The constitution has become a mere inconvenience nothing more.


5 posted on 03/26/2009 9:32:47 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend

It’s pretty obvious the guy is ineligible; there’s no other reasonable explanation for his refusal to release a certificate that would immediately render all of the lawsuits moot. He should have done it when the first suit was filed, but instead he fought it and all that followed, incurring legal fees that would be entirely unnecessary if he were actually eligible. This isn’t rocket science, and a “constitutional scholar” such as Obama would have known this from day one. Conclusion: Obama’s an illegal alien and must be removed from office.


6 posted on 03/26/2009 9:40:58 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

“...a “constitutional scholar” such as Obama would have known this from day one”

And what is interesting, is that Keyes is a “constitutional scholar” as well, (a real one, with a PhD in the subject). I am biased about the guy, but it would certainly be difficult to call him a racist for bringing the lawsuit, as it would be just as hard to say that he did not have standing.

All in all, it is just delicious!


7 posted on 03/26/2009 9:55:29 PM PDT by Habibi ("We gladly feast on those who would subdue us". Not just pretty words........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon
[Obama] incurring legal fees that would be entirely unnecessary if he were actually eligible

I think almost the opposite is true. Barry's legal expenses are almost certainly covered through his $700+M campaign warchest, irrespective any legal proscription. I'm sure he's felt not one iota of wont because of these lawsuits.

Dhims are uniquely and extraordinarily competent when wielding lawsuits--even those filed by their opponents--against their enemies. Barry is content to let his opponents spend out the wazzoo, while his minions see to such punitive responses as getting the State Department contractors who looked up Obmabi and Hillary's pass port records fired.

This empty suit of the most powerful man in the world isn't about to let a few legal system petitions geting in his way.

HF

8 posted on 03/26/2009 10:09:57 PM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

I would love to be able to break into the office where this birth certificate is being held and steal it just to see what it says then take it to someone who would finally expose O for the fraud he is.


9 posted on 03/26/2009 11:15:54 PM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pctech

I’d like to see some big $$$ rewards offered. Maybe that would shake things up a little.


10 posted on 03/27/2009 2:17:21 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Affirmative Action + Peter Principle = 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: holden
Barry's legal expenses are almost certainly covered through his $700+M campaign warchest,

I've heard this, and I've heard that the lawsuits are being defended pro bono.

What infuriates me about all of this, even if Zero really was born in Hawaii and the BC furor is a non-issue, is that you don't really know, and I don't really know, NO ONE apparently really knows, who's defending this guy and what it's costing. I keep asking complete strangers on the internet what they know, and all they can reply with is speculation. Not because they're stupid or won't answer - it's because we don't have a real media that will look into even that simple question.

Even if the BC IS a non-issue, even if you think the people who even raise the question are kooks, the information about who is defending 0bama IS an issue. It IS important. Why don't we know this? It's maddening. You can be DAMN sure we'd have an accounting for every penny expended if this were Bush and the situation was the same. And the rumors would be flying that it was Blackwater or Halliburton that was funding the suits.

11 posted on 03/27/2009 4:18:36 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (The Fairness Doctrine isn't about "Fairness" - it's about Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

This is not going away. When he is ousted I want all who lied for him to be accountable and shown to the world. We’re going to win this and bring order to this madness. I have opposed all this Marxist usurper from Kenya has said or done.


12 posted on 03/27/2009 6:58:23 AM PDT by freebird5850 (O-Bomba is not the Messia. Jesus was a carpenter and could build a cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson