[Fichori]

(The above [and below] is just the first paragraph, see the full article[s] at the link[s])

We should recognize that the lefts attempts to smear conservatives with claims of being anti-science, etc, are nothing but a canard to marginalize their opponents.

See also:

Evolution: The Anti-science

Some evolutionists have argued that science isn’t possible without evolution. They teach that science and technology actually require the principles of molecules-to-man evolution in order to work. They claim that those who hold to a biblical creation worldview are in danger of not being able to understand science! ^{1, 2, 3}

(Excerpt) Read more at answersingenesis.org ...

[freedumb2003]

Have a blessed day.

[valkyry1]

It has nothing to do with science, evolutionists hijack science for their own ends.

[Wolfstar]

Do Creationists Reject Science?

Based on the many posts I've read here on FR through the years, the answer is largely yes.

[RobbyS]

They teach that science and technology actually require the principles of molecules-to-man evolution in order to work.

It would have surprised Galileo and Newton to heard that.

[MortMan]

Do strawmen love to get knocked down?

[Carl LaFong]

No, they just reject Charles Johnson.

[Big_Monkey]

You can't pick and choose only scientific theorums, proofs, theories or facts that fit your mythology. Science is accepted in it's entirty, or it's rejected. Creationist do just this.

Every piece of empirical science, be it mathematics, biology, geo-physics, physics, anthropology, archeology and astronomy just to name a few, all point conclusively to an Earth, a Solar-System, a Galaxy and a universe that are billions of years old. If you can't accept that as proven, unequivocal scientific fact, then yes you're rejecting science.

[headsonpikes]

Falsifiability is one characteristic of scientific claims.

Let me know when you’re prepared to consider it.

[Colvin]

A couple of Creationists I know are Heart Surgeons, rather good ones, in Portland.
They obviously should be flipping burger. Biden believes in evolution, he can do the operations much better.

[OpeEdMunkey]

I dunno, but it appears that both sides reject how well the two theories dovetail.

[Rudder]

We should recognize that the lefts attempts to smear conservatives...

Most conservatives I know aren't stupid enough to fall into the creationist/ID trap.

[cripplecreek]

Some do but most don’t.

[Notary Sojac]

There are "creationists" whose belief is in a supreme being who brought life into existence, so that life did not originate from the random interactions of molecules. You can believe that and not have any problem with 99.9999999% of today's science.

There are also "creationists" whose belief is that the universe came into being less than 10,000 years ago, that dinosaurs and humans were contemporaries, and that the earth was once flooded with water to the point that the highest mountains were covered (almost six miles of water above current sea level). If you believe this, then yes, you and science are strangers.

Do you know how the "bird of paradise" got its name??

[tacticalogic]

They reject the substance, but will embrace the perception.

[ciwwaf]

Most of the outspoken creationists on this website don't reject science but reject science that conflicts with their belief. I've then seen the same people post the most ridiculous of articles from Christian science websites, some of that being ‘dark matter is god’, ‘pioneer anomaly is proof of god’, ‘some ridiculous flawed data and an even bigger flawed assumption is proof evolution is wrong’.

I don't want to criticize those people but when they start pushing for garbage like that to be taught in schools it becomes a real problem. Even worse than the current schooling situation.

Also, for what it's worth I believe in the Christian bible and i separately believe that using science one can logically come to the conclusion that god exists. But I've never seen anything come close to suggestion the bible is accurate.

[Jaime2099]

Some evolutionists have argued that science isn’t possible without evolution.

That's because they are a religion and the God of the Bible gets in the way of their religion. Therefore, they must discredit God and His followers whenever possible.

It is 100% incompatible to believe in Human Evolution from an animal and believe in the God of the Bible. God said we are descendants of Adam and later Noah. There were no animals created that evolved into man as he is today. To say otherwise is unscriptural, unchristian, unscientific (their is no proof, only guessing at best) and repulsive.

The Earth may very well be billions of years old (time is relative to God); this belief is not in opposition to the literal Genesis. What is in opposition is the blasphemous religion of Human Evolution and its sick and perverted teachings of animals evolving into humans. These foolish, child's fairy tales should be buried beneath a thousand tons of manure. Human Evolution is not science and anyone that calls a Creationist unscientific, yet believes that pile of filth, is no more scientifically knowledgeable than the most scientifically illiterate Creationist that was ever born.

[Oztrich Boy]

Bears. The Pope. You’ve got a theme running here.

[Buck W.]

Yes. Next question, please.

[wendy1946]

The short answer is no. There’s no honest or decent way to claim that rejecting a brain-dead ideological doctrine (evoloserism) is the same thing as rejecting “science”.

[DungeonMaster]

We reject pop science in favor of real science.