Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. urged to reject bar on defamation of religion
The Star ^ | March 25 2009 | Robert Evans

Posted on 03/25/2009 3:04:39 PM PDT by knighthawk

GENEVA (Reuters) - Some 200 secular, religious and media groups from around the world on Wednesday urged the United Nations Human Rights Council to reject a call from Islamic countries for a global fight against "defamation of religion".

The groups, including some Muslim bodies, issued their appeal in a statement on the eve of a vote in the Council in Geneva on a resolution proposed by the 56-nation Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC).

Such a resolution, the statement said, "may be used in certain countries to silence and intimidate human rights activists, religious dissenters and other independent voices", and to restrict freedom of religion and of speech.

The resolution, its critics say, would also restrict free speech and even academic study in open societies in the West and elsewhere.

Islamic countries argue that criticising or lampooning religions is a violation of the rights of believers and leads to discrimination and violence against them. Cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad, first published in a Danish newspaper, sparked riots in the Muslim world in 2006.

The OIC resolution says "Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism" and calls on U.N. member states "to combat defamation of religions and incitement to religious hatred in general .... "

BUILT-IN MAJORITY

Similar unbinding resolutions have been passed since 1999 in the U.N. General Assembly and by the 47-nation Human Rights Council, where Islamic countries and others who support them on the issue have a built-in majority.

But activist groups say the latest one -- tabled by Pakistan on behalf of the OIC -- is part of a growing offensive by the Islamic countries to impose their concepts of rights and religion on the rest of the world.

They argue that the concept of "defamation of religions" is so vague that it can be used against any challenge to a religious tenet and bolster laws against blasphemy in authoritarian regimes where one religion holds sway.

Condemnation of "defamation" was originally included in a draft of a declaration to be issued by a U.N. anti-racism conference, dubbed Durban II, in Geneva next month, but was withdrawn after Western countries said it was unacceptable.

However, critics say they fear OIC states and their allies are working to insert it in an existing U.N. convention against racial discrimination. They say "defamation of religion" has no validity in international law because only individuals, and not concepts or beliefs, can be defamed.

Among the groups signing Wednesday's statement were the International Humanist and Ethical Union, the Geneva-based U.N. Watch, the Muslim Council of Canada, the American Islamic Congress, the World Jewish Congress, the U.S. Freedom House, and the Paris-based International Press Institute. It was also backed by organisations representing believers, agnostics and atheists in India, Australia, Europe, Africa and Latin America.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: islam; oic; un; unitednations; unitednazis

1 posted on 03/25/2009 3:04:39 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

The full list of signatures:

http://www.humanrights-geneva.info/Rejection-of-defamation-of,4272


2 posted on 03/25/2009 3:06:36 PM PDT by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...

Ping


3 posted on 03/25/2009 3:07:35 PM PDT by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

muslims criticize jews and christians and all kinds of other religions all the time


4 posted on 03/25/2009 3:09:18 PM PDT by ari-freedom ( Hail to the Dork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I find these threads so much more understandable with a graphic.

There. That's better.

5 posted on 03/25/2009 3:11:53 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon you are talking about Zimbabwe money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

“muslims criticize jews and christians and all kinds of other religions all the time”

They do for a fact but this restriction would redound to their benefit much more than other religions. Other faiths rely on proselyting and open discussion about religion to build their membership. Muslims increase their numbers not by persuasion but by conquest.


6 posted on 03/25/2009 3:19:22 PM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I don’t understand why all the Jewish organizations are on the list. Don’t they understand that hatred for Jews doesn’t count — they have been grandfathered out and can still be vilified — and all this does is attempt to prevent the truth from being told about Islam and its intentions?


7 posted on 03/25/2009 3:24:33 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Let’s see... having a piggy bank on your desk at work..offensive to Muslims. Being Jewish or Christian..offensive to Muslims. Muslims calling Jews monkeys and demanding a new holocaust...perfectly OK. See how easy this is.


8 posted on 03/25/2009 3:27:09 PM PDT by The Great RJ (chain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
I find these threads so much more understandable with a graphic.

Perfect response.

My thousand words to correspond to your picture are here:

A Proposal to Clarify the Legal Definition of Religion

9 posted on 03/25/2009 3:33:25 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson