Indeed, it is a nice day here...
Neither you nor GourmetDan has been willing to answer my simple question. Instead you try your best to change the subject to something else.
And now you can say nothing except to blast away with insults.
How about if you practice "enough integrity to honestly respond" yourself, and answer my question:
At what precise point does "micro-evolution" turn into "macro-evolution"?
[[Neither you nor GourmetDan has been willing to answer my simple question.]]
Wrong- I did answer it in full- you’ll find hte answer up a few posts
[[At what precise point does “micro-evolution” turn into “macro-evolution”?]]
As explained many itmes already- there is no ‘precise point’ because they are two wholly different biological processes- one that exists in reality, and one that is not a scientific reality in nature- Macroevo is a hypothesis that violates chemical, biological, natural and mathematical laws- Microevo is a process that has defiend species specific limitations due to species specific paramters- We know this through myriad tests and experiments- species reamin within their own kinds despite htrowing billions of years worth of mutaitons at them- Micro can not, and does not, nor has ever led to macroevo because hte two are exclusive biological processes which are NOT related one to hte other-
As mentioned, you’ll find the explanation in full some posts back
[[And now you can say nothing except to blast away with insults.]]
Just returnign your volleys sir- if you don’t care to defend agaisnt the returned volleys, don’t serve up the first shots- pretty simple