Funny, I didn’t hear such comments when a certain Chicago based company up and moved to Iowa and did not pay their workers. There was a legal contract...but of course these were working people-union scum-so this makes it just fine. We can selectively enforce contracts.
http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2008/12/plant-sit-in-in-4th-day-meeting-scheduled.html
>>>union scum
Your tone shows before your message.
According to the link you provided, the company, its bank, and the union are involved in a lawsuit over the issues you say are clear cut. I believe in “a deal is a deal.” If they had a deal, then the company must pay or file for bankruptcy and the judge will pay out of the proceeds of the liquidation.
According to your link, it appears the bank may be liable to the state for recommending to the company that they not provide the (immoral?) 60 day notice. (It’s immoral because mandatory notices, particularly long ones like they have in Europe dramatically increase unemployment—unintended consequences).
In the AIG case, there appears to this man’s letter there was a clear contract. He was to receive money for work performed, Obama and Democrats lied, their fake “outrage” broke commercial agreements.
Everyone works not only in an economy, but also in a political economy. Governance and property rights are joined at the hip with the economy. Obamatons, and others, have just advertised that the U.S. is not a safe place to do business.
I think the courts will handle the Chicago company that moved to Iowa.