He sued for breach of contract, and the case was settled (i.e., he got money). The facts are remarkably different, as well. The contract that Feilbogen sued for breach wasn't in the nature of a retention bonus, for one thing.
It was a legal contract however, is their some new rule that I was unaware of that only retention bonus contracts need to be enforced? Kind of picking and choosing aren’t you. It was legal contract. AIG had no problem breaking it did they?
They sure are. In that case AIG was solvent and DeSantis was Feilbogen's boss. In this case AIG was insolvent and taxpayer money was and is being used to fund all of the divisions ops. There's also the difference that in that case DeSantis didn't pitch a fit and have a M. Teresa moment. Another difference, according to DeSantis, is that he was just working for a dollar here and had a duty to the politicians, as he said. That must have been to cover and clean up for AIG's complicity in Barney fag and D miricles's work.