Posted on 03/24/2009 7:21:53 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
For the record, Laura Ingraham never actually called Meghan McCain fat. However, Ingraham has been dead on hilarious in her imitation of Meghan's mindless sounding Valley Girl accent. A quick listen to Ms McCain's voice on this video clip of her appearance on CNN's Larry King Live last night brought back memories of the years your humble correspondent spent in the San Fernando Valley area of Los Angeles, birthplace of the Valley Girl accent which, unfortunately, spread to many parts of the country. That Valspeak accent still painfully reverberates in my ears yet despite my earnest hope that it would die a permanent death, along comes Meghan McCain to resurrect that annoying sound in interview after interview in her quest for eternal publicity for herself.
So how does someone who sounds so annoyingly vacuous rate so much publicity? Simple. When a Republican (or relative of a prominent Republican) slams Republicans and/or conservatives, such a person will be enthusiastically given a national forum by the MSM. Even someone like John McCain's daughter who doesn't really sound all that interested in political issues. As you can see in this interview, Valley Girl McCain seems much more enthusiastic rambling on about how she was supposedly "dissed" by Laura Ingraham and carefully pondering which tattoo to choose for her wrist. First Larry plays a video clip of Barack Obama laughing while discussing the economic crises during his 60 Minutes interview with Steve Kroft then asks Meghan for her "learned" input:
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
She says she is liberal on social issues, that she supports gay marriage
and personally is pro-life but not going to judge someone that is pro-choice
because it is “not her place to judge other people and what they do with their body.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMr8z-lsf84
Then she is, like, so totally NOT, like, pro-life.
Why the need to totally nuance everything and such like?
“not her place to judge other people and what they do with their body.”
Own it, Miss Megan.
You are a lib!
Why be ashamed of it?
... anything other than a flaming Liberal.
"I oppose abortion, personally. I don't like abortion. I believe life does begin at conception."--Interview in the Dubuque, Iowa, Telegraph Herald, July 2004"First of all, I cannot tell you how deeply I respect the belief about life and when it begins. I'm a Catholic - raised a Catholic. I was an altar boy. Religion has been a huge part of my life, helped lead me through a war, leads me today."But I can't take what is an article of faith for me and legislate it for someone who doesn't share that article of faith, whether they be agnostic, atheist, Jew, Protestant, whatever. I can't do that. But I can counsel people, I can talk reasonably about life and about responsibility."
--Second Presidential Debate, St. Louis, October 8, 2004
I would be willing to write a letter, with copies delivered to the official domain registrant of McCainBlogette.com, as well as the offices of The Daily Beast, Sen. McCain, Ann Coulter, and Laura Ingraham, if other Freepers in their late teens and early to mid twenties would be willing to collaborate on and cosign the letter.
Meghan McCain is appointing herself the spokeswoman of an entire generation. And, the media is using her as the spokeswoman of the Republican Party.
What a twit. She probably things that young conservatives and young libertarians are abominations.
Dang... another set of criteria I can't meet. LOL.
Mom, don't know why you didn’t simply provide this info yourself, as was your responsibility.
This line of reasoning, like, makes SO much sense...
“I’m personally pro-life because I don’t want to kill my baby, but I’m not going to judge anyone else for doing what they want with THEIR OWN body.”
Makes perfect sense! /s
Perhaps you should do your homework before stomping your feet and crying "Prove It, Prove It!!!!"
I only jumped in to stop the senseless whining.
The person making the claim always has the responsibility to prove the claim upon request.
Your perversity, notwithstanding, thems the rules.
Next time, butt out.
Well you had a “responsibility” to prove that Meghan McCain was pro-life as you stated and you didn’t do that very well and I’m not going to provide a link to someone that demands it of me—especially since it was common knowledge about John Kerry’s duplicity and can be easily Google searched. It’s not like it was obscure, hard to find info. If that were the case, I would have been more than happy to provide the source.
And her entire vision is....? same sex marriage, abortions, “Like don't judge, ya know,I am proud that I am not understood by republicans, it's a generational thing, ya know”
You accuse Meg of being shallow? Here she is writing about IMPORTANT issues like having trouble dating since dad ran for president. Turns out she doesnt like guys that worship her Dad. Hey, Rabs, How about you? You dont worship McCain!
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-03-02/looking-for-mr-far-right/2/
She’d be on every supermarket magazine cover if McCain had been elected.
LOL! Perfect.
You accuse Meg of being shallow?
Guilty, as charged!
Turns out she doesnt like guys that worship her Dad. Hey, Rabs, How about you? You dont worship McCain!
Go for it Rabs. The dream-date in waiting! ;-)
Prove it! ;-)
Well put, reminds me of Cindy Sheenan. The MSM really threw clueless Cindy away when her usefulness came to an end. She was on Larry King too. Both women are pretty dumb and uninformed. As far as representing republican party??, What party? Do we have a party?
I never even heard of Meghan till Rabs started pinging me a couple of weeks ago.
Teen Beauty Queen Review of the News;
http://wbal.com/apps/news/templates/story.aspx?articleid=23667&zoneid=15
This bit started out on my local radio station last year after some teen beauty contestant made a fool of herself in the Q & A.
I can’t believe it is still going. But, it’s like, totally, like still funny!
Look at what happened to the last high-profile moderate Republican woman, Susan Molinari. At least she had a position of leadership in the House, was an elected official, didn't simply ride on her father's office. But she let the MSM-stuff go to her head, her stint on Saturday-morning news extremely short-lived.
Someone please explain for me why anyone ought to give the daughter of a losing presidential candidate any credence whatsoever??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.