Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: polymuser

So, while one “volunteers”, they lose their constitutional rights?


70 posted on 03/24/2009 7:02:59 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Travis T. OJustice

Yep, that’s what I got out of that too... What’s interesting is that there was some wording about this being a permanent cadre, and that people would be subject to being called-in in case of an emergency. One wonders what kind of restrictions will be placed on these people when they are in the “reserves”.


72 posted on 03/24/2009 7:07:36 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Travis T. OJustice

“So, while one “volunteers”, they lose their constitutional rights?”

Aren’t active military fols supposed to refrain from political activities?

Moot, though, the Senate version does not have that section.


81 posted on 03/24/2009 7:19:32 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Travis T. OJustice; metmom

yep and no religion allowed either


118 posted on 03/24/2009 9:14:56 AM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson