Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doomed SWAT sergeants didn't expect an AK-47
SF Gate ^ | 23 Mar 09 | Phillip Matier, Andrew Ross

Posted on 03/23/2009 10:24:17 AM PDT by Drew68

When Oakland police Sgts. Ervin Romans and Daniel Sakai burst into an apartment on 74th Avenue on Saturday, they knew they were entering a dangerous situation. After all, they were looking for a man who had already killed two police officers.

What they didn't know was that the killer, Lovelle Mixon, had somehow gotten hold of an AK-47 assault rifle, police officials say. All they knew was that the gunman who had shot motorcycle officers Sgt. Mark Dunakin and Officer John Hege about two hours earlier used a handgun.

"Nobody knew he had an AK-47," said City Councilman Ignacio De La Fuente, who was among four council members to join Mayor Ron Dellums and acting Police Chief Howard Jordan for a late-night press conference Saturday.

The bulletproof vests that Romans and Sakai wore were no help - when Mixon fired his automatic rifle through a closet door in the apartment, he hit the two sergeants in the head.

The killings of four officers would devastate any police department. But it was especially traumatic for an Oakland force that has been beefed up in recent years with a lot of young, inexperienced cops.

"We've got a really young force out there, and this is really hitting them hard," officer Bob Valladon, former head of the Oakland Police Officers Association, said Sunday as he drove from one slain officer's home to another to meet with their families. "We've hired maybe 25o new cops in the past five years, so about a quarter of the force has never seen anything like this. No one has.

"These cops (who were killed) were veterans," Valladon said. "The best of the best."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; dewberry; dewberrylaw; leo; lisadewberry; lovellemixon; oakland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-200 next last
To: DuncanWaring
That’s certainly true, but the question remains “Is the story as published accurate?”.

It was in a newspaper, so I'd venture to say "No way.".

41 posted on 03/23/2009 10:40:26 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Just another aside. In my former life as a jarhead, we had MOUT training (Military operations in urban terrain) which is the closest to this situation I know about. I remember from training if you were confronted with known bad guys behind a door, you throw in a bunch of grenades and charge in after the explosion. The theory being that if you don’t kill them, the concussive force of the grenade will disorient them for those precious few seconds afterwards where you have the advantage.

I’m not saying that the SWAT team should be throwing grenades in, but even the military does no train you to go charging through the door where known armed bad guys are.


42 posted on 03/23/2009 10:40:43 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
An AK47 Auto Assault rifle or a semi auto rifle?
43 posted on 03/23/2009 10:40:53 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Osamabama the Wright kind of Racist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Unfortunately, I suspect they weren’t thinking straight when the went in. They wanted to get the SOB who shot their colleagues.

This is a time when an FBI team or any outside team that wasn’t emotionally involved with the situation should have been used.


44 posted on 03/23/2009 10:41:39 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Nothing you said is incorrect.

However, I’m interested in the background. Is this just a simple case of “felon in illegal possession of weapon”, or is it “felon in illegal possession of NFA Class III weapon”.

If it’s the latter, starts to fall into the “Black Swan” category”. How did he pay for it if it was going for anywhere near the full market value? If he didn’t pay full market value, what else did he do to acquire it? How many more of them are there out there?


45 posted on 03/23/2009 10:42:27 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
the killer, Lovelle Mixon, had somehow gotten hold of an AK-47 assault rifle

The guys runs into an apartment and they happen to have a AK-47 in their closet? Something isn't being told yet.

46 posted on 03/23/2009 10:43:39 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

An AK-47 has a very distinctive sound/report when fired. It’s noticeablly more of a POW than the pop of an AR-15 or 9 mm. *IF* they had heard the weapon fire, they would’ve known better what they were up against.

I wonder if the perp had fired the weapon previously within earshot of the officers.

Perhaps not since he was hiding in the closet.

It’ll be interesting to find out (IF we ever do) if the perp had a genuine fully automatice AK-47 or just a semi-automtic rifle with a curved magazine.


47 posted on 03/23/2009 10:44:20 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

When I lived in Oakland about 20 years ago near MacArthur and Fruitvale, it was not uncommon to hear automatic weapons “celebratory” fire on some evenings. Not every night to be sure, but often enough. So it would reasonable to assume that your typical Oakland gang-banger would have access to to a weapon like that.


48 posted on 03/23/2009 10:44:27 AM PDT by Dan Cooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

You’re probably right, but it would be nice to know for sure.


49 posted on 03/23/2009 10:44:47 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
when Mixon fired his automatic rifle through a closet door in the apartment, he hit the two sergeants in the head

Whoa - wait a second - this doesn't pass the smell test.

Weren't they wearing helmets?

He put a 125 to 150 grain round THROUGH A DOOR, and he managed to miss the officer's helmet, but he still hit him in the head and delivered a fatal wound?!?

And he did it not once, but TWICE - to two different officers?!?!?

That's like a million-to-one even followed by a second million-to-one event, for something like a trillion-to-one sequence of events.

This stinks to high heaven.

50 posted on 03/23/2009 10:45:03 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Since “assault weapons” are already banned in Kali, he must have bought it from one of those Mexican drug lords. If they can smuggle in semi loads of drugs, why couldn't they smuggle in semi loads of “assault weapons”?
51 posted on 03/23/2009 10:45:04 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Leave it to the San Fransissyco Comical not to know what the weapon is...in an sidebar story, the rag claims it was a "semiautomatic pistol" click here
52 posted on 03/23/2009 10:45:14 AM PDT by meandog (The only "Bush" sounding surname worth a damn belongs to NASCAR's Kurt&Kyle Busch--not GEORGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Oh. My bad. I retrieve my comment that SWAT should have apprehended at the apartment. Looks as though they did. I just thought they went in like in the movies fully ready for guns such as this. But I guess I need to get out more. LOL. Very sad. Very sad indeed. What a POS the criminal is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


53 posted on 03/23/2009 10:45:44 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

SFGate has an AK47, as does KTVU, but KTVU also claims the handgun was an “automatic”, when, in fact, it wasn’t.

So, I think I’ll wait a bit for the official word. Most of the stories appear to be quoting an attorney who says he’s representing the officer’s families.


54 posted on 03/23/2009 10:46:27 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg ("the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs" - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

I’m guessing the helmets are more resistant to “blunt force trauma” than they are to bullets.


55 posted on 03/23/2009 10:46:33 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Maybe some police officers out there could tell me what the correct procedures are, but it seems to me that if you know a guy who just killed two cops is in an apartment you don’t just go charging in.

I suspect that after having two of their own just blown away, they made some costly errors in regards to their entry.

56 posted on 03/23/2009 10:46:44 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

The article says “automatic rifle” -

but I doubt the author knows the difference.

Besides, if it was, it was illegal for him to have it.

Besides, if he was a convict on parole, it was illegal to have ANY firearm.

So, no new laws would make a difference.


57 posted on 03/23/2009 10:46:47 AM PDT by MrB (irreconcilable: One of two or more conflicting ideas or beliefs that cannot be brought into harmony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Why, when they knew the guy was dead, were they worried about what they would find? Why, when they knew the guy used a handgun to snuff 4 officers, did they think the AK was such a big deal? Why, knowing this a**hat was a convicted felon, unable to obtain a weapon legally, are they not pursuring that line instead of pushing the assault weapon ban? Full auto AKs are already illegal, it is already illegal for felons to own and possess any firearms. Why then do they think that more laws will stop this from happening?

Not paroling the criminal bas**** would have stopped it.

Anything for an excuse to ban guns from law abding citizens.

I believe, and you can call me tin foil wearer if you want, but I believe that many of these incidents are orchestrated by the left in order to push their anti-gun agenda.

58 posted on 03/23/2009 10:46:53 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

The better question to ask is why this violent felon was out on the streets to begin with. Why wasn’t he in prison? Of course the stupid liberals of the SF Chronicle would never dream of writing about that. This liberal newspaper needs to go bankrupt.


59 posted on 03/23/2009 10:46:56 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Well then they skimped on their helmet budget.


60 posted on 03/23/2009 10:47:10 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson