Posted on 03/23/2009 10:24:17 AM PDT by Drew68
It was in a newspaper, so I'd venture to say "No way.".
Just another aside. In my former life as a jarhead, we had MOUT training (Military operations in urban terrain) which is the closest to this situation I know about. I remember from training if you were confronted with known bad guys behind a door, you throw in a bunch of grenades and charge in after the explosion. The theory being that if you don’t kill them, the concussive force of the grenade will disorient them for those precious few seconds afterwards where you have the advantage.
I’m not saying that the SWAT team should be throwing grenades in, but even the military does no train you to go charging through the door where known armed bad guys are.
Unfortunately, I suspect they weren’t thinking straight when the went in. They wanted to get the SOB who shot their colleagues.
This is a time when an FBI team or any outside team that wasn’t emotionally involved with the situation should have been used.
Nothing you said is incorrect.
However, I’m interested in the background. Is this just a simple case of “felon in illegal possession of weapon”, or is it “felon in illegal possession of NFA Class III weapon”.
If it’s the latter, starts to fall into the “Black Swan” category”. How did he pay for it if it was going for anywhere near the full market value? If he didn’t pay full market value, what else did he do to acquire it? How many more of them are there out there?
The guys runs into an apartment and they happen to have a AK-47 in their closet? Something isn't being told yet.
An AK-47 has a very distinctive sound/report when fired. It’s noticeablly more of a POW than the pop of an AR-15 or 9 mm. *IF* they had heard the weapon fire, they would’ve known better what they were up against.
I wonder if the perp had fired the weapon previously within earshot of the officers.
Perhaps not since he was hiding in the closet.
It’ll be interesting to find out (IF we ever do) if the perp had a genuine fully automatice AK-47 or just a semi-automtic rifle with a curved magazine.
When I lived in Oakland about 20 years ago near MacArthur and Fruitvale, it was not uncommon to hear automatic weapons “celebratory” fire on some evenings. Not every night to be sure, but often enough. So it would reasonable to assume that your typical Oakland gang-banger would have access to to a weapon like that.
You’re probably right, but it would be nice to know for sure.
Whoa - wait a second - this doesn't pass the smell test.
Weren't they wearing helmets?
He put a 125 to 150 grain round THROUGH A DOOR, and he managed to miss the officer's helmet, but he still hit him in the head and delivered a fatal wound?!?
And he did it not once, but TWICE - to two different officers?!?!?
That's like a million-to-one even followed by a second million-to-one event, for something like a trillion-to-one sequence of events.
This stinks to high heaven.
Oh. My bad. I retrieve my comment that SWAT should have apprehended at the apartment. Looks as though they did. I just thought they went in like in the movies fully ready for guns such as this. But I guess I need to get out more. LOL. Very sad. Very sad indeed. What a POS the criminal is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SFGate has an AK47, as does KTVU, but KTVU also claims the handgun was an “automatic”, when, in fact, it wasn’t.
So, I think I’ll wait a bit for the official word. Most of the stories appear to be quoting an attorney who says he’s representing the officer’s families.
I’m guessing the helmets are more resistant to “blunt force trauma” than they are to bullets.
I suspect that after having two of their own just blown away, they made some costly errors in regards to their entry.
The article says “automatic rifle” -
but I doubt the author knows the difference.
Besides, if it was, it was illegal for him to have it.
Besides, if he was a convict on parole, it was illegal to have ANY firearm.
So, no new laws would make a difference.
Not paroling the criminal bas**** would have stopped it.
Anything for an excuse to ban guns from law abding citizens.
I believe, and you can call me tin foil wearer if you want, but I believe that many of these incidents are orchestrated by the left in order to push their anti-gun agenda.
The better question to ask is why this violent felon was out on the streets to begin with. Why wasn’t he in prison? Of course the stupid liberals of the SF Chronicle would never dream of writing about that. This liberal newspaper needs to go bankrupt.
Well then they skimped on their helmet budget.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.