Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luke21
Good news alert.

It's not good news. It's just as insane as any decision that the liberals love like finding some "right to privacy" in the "penumbras" of the Constitution that means that it's okay to kill inconvenient babies.

If the cameras are unconstitutional in Minnesota for the reason stated by the judge then every traffic stop is illegal too because it has been made by some cop who is at one specific location and has not been observing the entire state. You can be sure that no one involved in the drafting of that Minnesota Constitution thought that some statement about uniformity in enforcement of the law throughout the State meant that there could be no patrols anywhere to attempt to curtail illegal activity.

ML/NJ

17 posted on 03/22/2009 9:39:54 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj

That’s a little far fetched. Traffic stops are done throughout the state, and people are given tickets for a variety of reasons throughout the state, so that satisfies “uniformity of enforcement”, because it occurs everywhere.


23 posted on 03/22/2009 9:46:38 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson