Since you defended the selection of Kundra when I posted a thread questioning it:
Federal Computer Week: Kundra’s job is now in question
http://fcw.com/articles/2009/03/13/analysis-kundra-now-in-question.aspx?page=1
Kundra, former chief technology officer for Washington, D.C., had been appointed to the post March 5, but took a leave of absence last week, after the FBI arrested a D.C. information security officer and a contractor as part of a bribery investigation.
The FBI on March 12 arrested Yusuf Acar, an information security specialist who worked for Kundra, and charged him with bribery, conspiracy, money laundering and conflict of interest. The FBI also arrested Sushil Bansal, president and chief executive officer of Advanced Integrated Technologies Corp., on charges of bribery and money laundering.
http://fcw.com/articles/2009/03/17/kundra-reinstated.aspx
So this to you is defending?
“if Obama picked him he is probably screw up regardless of what software he pushes. I would think a 34yo is hardly old enough to qualify for such a position.” and “Obviously a guy with little serious security background. *anything* with personal information of *any* American citizen needs to be private by default” — n3wbi3
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2200383/posts?page=29#29
—
Its the height of hilarity that you consider this is me ‘defending’ the pick when in reality I am as against it as anyone else. Maybe this should get tacked onto the giant list of Golden Eagle Lies that others have kept track of..
If I could change my FReeper name to Schadenfreude, I'd do it in an instant. Maybe I'll settle for a keyword...